From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE5739DBFC; Wed, 29 Apr 2026 07:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777446120; cv=none; b=VaLXEm3QSiSD3gknDwUHEqS/3BPRkdyQIzmoBT7opZrzfyvvMTqTPRcIYV+NNzjwHFu3BE738WYbQrhtJ4x0urfbb41y4YFq9IjcpQsZpYksUtCqoz7ygaBTz2cclAh1s7n6jIrfbXu0/Q3kCSd6Dsew8MLZHyTLMf9woUFnRWk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777446120; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/ZwfX7O5SCBOQ98YvFl//tUB0hURsI3izutezHbDmao=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=r3K4nvi+AD2Whb9bR+1eZl4MBgwNTfiXLvT11ZMiptyLgji/EsrSegzYLkp1VPh2o7Y8nxn4ASSH63mp1FKo/Njwz71TcOwYsL4ejgAtYmaRqjSmGouPRx/LTTEoJfEKH8A4HmussFRRsLc+x/pASUmgvVsWdIRyYAcVjhdnG0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=AO4YWd4r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="AO4YWd4r" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777446120; x=1808982120; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=/ZwfX7O5SCBOQ98YvFl//tUB0hURsI3izutezHbDmao=; b=AO4YWd4rkzVkgXNJ+o5R+J0oSUEvBTJLoibF3lKphK/GoMRrxNx+XBZT OYkLVBkVp2C6Zsv9T5uLcPtSUluwhXebOUD8vf6nIWbLaPU2+OVuJTc+P Vk88KXqdQliYq9cO/0iLzkb2C/HarOqUOn6VDZ0hg740bWj56v7iNpcg7 ziDxDpgWmX6jaxVSSINv3XR/3W+2d3e0ulfyulsgwOtiV9WEqofmrSsCi Ph0+M65P2Qc7tagdRPMY9P5+KZVGWmr0x9g08r6D4D+YZJloyqMFZlk3n ezD8F9xBMgBJB7rwnTnxb/ig5v+rGNCdU7Gt7Lr3b/amgQ6HkdqhmZOwX A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bndMAB+cTzK/4UkEp/A9YQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: sMpnGDN6TZCfmGfIXNyOxQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11770"; a="77397301" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="77397301" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 00:01:59 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: W4F9L/V4RUis/KgyFnJCdg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NGn6l15USxa9twXStA4k5w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,205,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="229836051" Received: from ettammin-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.141]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Apr 2026 00:01:56 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 10:01:54 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Felix Gu , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Lars-Peter Clausen , Arnaud Pouliquen , Mark Brown , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: buffer: hw-consumer: fix use-after-free in error path Message-ID: References: <20260428192636.58e4fc8b@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 11:34:22AM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:59:28 +0300 > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > >> I am also wondering should we put Reported-by with the reference to AI somehow? > >> Jonathan, others, what are your opinions? > > > > Would be nice to do so for these - things noticed whilst reviewing a patch > > type reports. > > > > Roman (+CC), any suggestions on how to do this? > > I appreciate when people are recognizing Sashiko, but I don’t have any strong > preference. Many engineers are using it locally before sending patches > upstream, so we’ll never know it anyway. But Reported-by/Assisted-by tags are > appreciated when appropriate. The problem is what to put to Reported-by as an email. For example LKP bot or syzbot have dedicated emails for that. What about Sashiko? P.S. An offtopic, how can I be email notified on the reviews done by Sashiko against my patches sent to Linux kernel project (mailing lists)? If you can add me as andy@kernel.org, I appreciate that! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko