From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A2B399004; Mon, 4 May 2026 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777890011; cv=none; b=iHVZswLPmvLmn9feizwl9kXaOyU92ErE+Ib0s4ydjuhyySNQriDCihT3flWPrLsCukaVBydYuhnYFMNQYIJkftd8RuHzzXT9hmWHSpL40Rvtssl7yeg7ktogUvLA1L3N2q9b4THqUQzDmu3sweeJBMSkfqxvGh14N2h0HdwIIQs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777890011; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BZDIAgth4Eb1/4yxW97Jyv0o7RMBiduj489saa3JUFo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=u6ldbv6hiVjCkcZzVWV//n9W8/Xnj8+UjZEd/3iyIEas/Zqs8r7mMBY4j35hadcxYTh04rHip8z4exMVNR95M7tkFgVS7s2HlWjNlLNUxNckr8j4pGyX0zl2ZlEHHTmwlDBP/e2z9FqV9mvP38wuIpDuwv9zT1Zxvva0C4Hn/xg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=C566SCZr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="C566SCZr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777890010; x=1809426010; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BZDIAgth4Eb1/4yxW97Jyv0o7RMBiduj489saa3JUFo=; b=C566SCZrTgIAuiiiYJjo8XvPB5HlwYUSRSbYv8lSps4puahJmxpiy9RR SVN4hkWb2OOi0avXAE+pAiGz6aqvw07mMlGb14JHgAQk+mnceDr+7oiQe 2p5ihH0yvgaJ5pD7T9A8tPwW0W9pZ+L0Gw4hlneLaFVqltNR1CoTBtdUZ 3Oc5owRAesEDPcih3uppovBR6n1jgVmtrC9nKfitwK2e+55811GJ7jxON JA4PlotZnL+PudaBzm6FZILCzr0pOhsxuKpn2vCMlRlxS9zUIc0sKQEQt za/99CfX0fynHnIjRRwwFnn8tPN3nzbAatK6svS7fvkwFc07SK8/DVxRW A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nWt5ezm1TZKAXyho0el1tQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7dPEvyvUQbiZwWjc4UHQZg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11775"; a="78607332" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,215,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="78607332" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 May 2026 03:20:10 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uU/uDDcHTcqHQQuOmOLLzA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /u+eFunURu2nBpl+SGZ1rw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,215,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="273602467" Received: from hrotuna-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.78]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 May 2026 03:20:08 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 13:20:05 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Joshua Crofts Cc: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 00/14] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: Additional changes to the driver Message-ID: References: <20260427201412.3067235-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20260428173540.28b7913e@jic23-huawei> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 12:13:45PM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > On Mon, 4 May 2026 at 11:18, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 11:13:36AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 at 18:35, Jonathan Cameron wrote: ... > > > Given the relatively big backlog of email in the list, should I wait a > > > bit longer sending the combined series? > > > > I'm fine if you send it today or this week. > > Is it fine if I do a RESEND PATCH after rebasing or should I wait? Sashiko > reported "failed to apply". Better to wait, have you missed the --base argument? Or is it incorrect? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko