From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 297C8365A19; Mon, 11 May 2026 11:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778497902; cv=none; b=NTzljEizIaBCYRA7bI5Qy7/uwQt5WrhP1cRGjkOjyoiVj8N8lZjVgxjQpK/Eo8NAT//DHDUD7nVVo03j3zjOu0cz4TpvTkYrozqO6jiYpyceSHWPa6R9SMBKC6SpifSDLoLKvhmwPW1HTaWfZHwinkYcuPt/UGbQI4pmTM5yjYE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778497902; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JkTO9blcVCvZK1W2Z018jx7UWK6xSuWZtvIKb7skA/g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PwWQkC2x8gXSwfHXvwivzdvAr9GqTcl1RQBSGlMkmI6JltXgb5646cpHV0ScHQmPfTAnQNYQWNxRzl0BqI2CmRmBrMVRJb06nfwkZxV4RlS6ozlr6Sj/N5wz8rBZScmMxfJ4DwCiHzX7m9WykcpFw8u30nulspJbLerSvXfyfOo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jzMoXiBe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jzMoXiBe" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778497901; x=1810033901; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JkTO9blcVCvZK1W2Z018jx7UWK6xSuWZtvIKb7skA/g=; b=jzMoXiBecC4HLuesE0r4CaLsqDKFBWCW06CW55qH1fbpaDLpnwwfBVq8 aCrKdDhZM1LKnDU7m+9Nl6YqIJIadYgbuNOaHUy+IToY/XxSHmt7Chobk lKsQlzl9Wz5VRMDkC6jZ4E+uoWtwCoDEr0YB/eCkiHOePhKDbK3MgpbVF dIBvdt+8TdBorZIlYitpnE2yViSJYIbHaT3vE2+sdgRV2OlDPenJwvH8X JgGv7Y6ShXRLpKGJxTnATkAWCs9XboeQ2N3EbDzNQrV3V+VZi9+z0o6UP dF0ismiuZK56RVf8as2WDXBbKgP5Jd5uR6ZbgVWCYZEPL+JskHs1Fxsn5 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 9ixyvI35Rkm7F9dl6XUPBg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WKsjFZA1ST+bpiX+nPuajg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11782"; a="90481907" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,228,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="90481907" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 04:11:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: sdzafNOHTWCtiacdqXAmvg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: AdhlLOD1SCqMKRC8ORNGhg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,228,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="242407112" Received: from klitkey1-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.204]) by orviesa005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2026 04:11:38 -0700 Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 14:11:36 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: joshua.crofts1@gmail.com Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] iio: light: opt3001: remove unnecessary comments Message-ID: References: <20260511-opt3001-cleanup-v1-0-f7879dc3455c@gmail.com> <20260511-opt3001-cleanup-v1-6-f7879dc3455c@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260511-opt3001-cleanup-v1-6-f7879dc3455c@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 12:04:11PM +0200, Joshua Crofts via B4 Relay wrote: > Remove unnecessary comments as code is self explanatory. I won't touch the first two. They might still help to easy navigate in the code for anybody who reads it in the first time. ... > - { } /* Terminating Entry */ > + { } Only this one makes sense to me, but since it's just comment, I would dare to kill 'em all in each of the subfolders of IIO in a single patch (id est one patch for all in iio/adc, one for iio/dac, and so on). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko