From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4219F3A7D60; Tue, 12 May 2026 15:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778600451; cv=none; b=lmLLZnAkzuDR3EpUNq6DqkE9qDrij8zrQlyMb0Thrc/S6F8VDuhxMQGCjG0d7wZ8Xs/kldf3K8h0XI2gXZxxSrqYMOk+nOY6MBZHhCD36aI9MBO4NcgYPuj0ycQwkfQesNaozoLIqI7WfOEyGCyD2+EHQ/iPOdgY/1CqdNwh/Zw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778600451; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3GlVTcCmXfG89+IYN/RfXlrItpYrad4v5nTTBBvkQKA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=osreQyNaM1l1Egua12GKvuVmxBLPVmfxAJeqTFlTeyacxcpM7i5kwfqvv9ZBMwWq90qmxxXlceS6UoCsaTzjlKCeQEsqlOzBnS6MnVS1UKe3v20WDjDtKApQVlvl5ZX9Emm7cmUIzONSvhmEWHgamiKlGFTy0G7YKXdl4KZVCok= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aJitXsRQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aJitXsRQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1778600450; x=1810136450; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=3GlVTcCmXfG89+IYN/RfXlrItpYrad4v5nTTBBvkQKA=; b=aJitXsRQ9V4f0uNn9WIIC2l224/BwX3lNtDox0bFFO0x9gskbkDTq2jE nuQuaBVwVN+CWV0vBpQzTpEbCutABunCuNmnFwq4q69+3o5Ajqw1QS0qI Dwte+ftysoXu+fQoRFQDqRNMpuPQ/3EzRNGRQD95W5a7p69FYYADQrDi/ gtG7tC8skgKz9huNQQX2DH/TZNoFlP5hJsTBa6SMyUWcfQP2NNwsxMvN4 hjC4MAw52Y8/fdDmzY/j9lkDcqVfAluuZbtMt5KFrd1Rn9ifduHKAefgN TFqV5yKCkWpCgxl4C23sV9jsSwIzzO/nXh0ZWGCE6Lcdsfa67Hgeol7jx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: e5zWkZ0uRH625MqigAsoSg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ateg/0YKTuWC92JwUaZcLA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11784"; a="79369174" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,231,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="79369174" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 08:40:49 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1TWgixILS6SKT0PYw0Tg5A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9m0JjufLQJiicXGAX0OuSw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,231,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="236817048" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.244]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2026 08:40:47 -0700 Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 18:40:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: joshua.crofts1@gmail.com Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , Alexander Koch , Michael Hornung , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] iio: light: opt3001: localize for loop iterator Message-ID: References: <20260512-opt3001-cleanup-v2-0-8018cf3a8a0a@gmail.com> <20260512-opt3001-cleanup-v2-6-8018cf3a8a0a@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260512-opt3001-cleanup-v2-6-8018cf3a8a0a@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 12:57:26PM +0200, Joshua Crofts via B4 Relay wrote: > Localize loop iterator to tighten scope and improve code style > per checkpatch.pl report. > > No functional change. ... > const struct opt3001_scale *scale = &(*opt->chip_info->scales)[i]; This is an interesting way of writing &opt->chip_info->scales[i] ? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko