From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9703B14B2; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 06:58:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781765935; cv=none; b=AUvG+77rMoLIEIspxNeu7IETt/KO0a0ZppF6o00vzjNxmt9HRdUOLqba9V2Qa9AsafohOz+Uxo0w+0idhXrvLJKd1bZD3jc4D4LHT3id5G/0RbeS3QJ1yLWWgEqaEptdc32cLkihZNXJ9dkJXg8M988GKuD7KCs4Th6b6z6AN34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781765935; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tq/dT8JFO6HS4UbFJa31X6TBwZiDgp2XMEg0iJqJqF4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SM58EoflSZXlfsgBu86FhoFTfBraRlqZruN59odoF04H5oO7p3U3+fFhuBZNtmX/xaesdxRx+m/ZkIBe3qdiPb5lm1FEpKuIlrifHzC/ghXXF4AV4R4apxqdqi4BsXkruwQB6vgEAWuxuKDLIeCGa8xSRFlxHcSS1KX94UPEF+k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=dCELgPZp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="dCELgPZp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1781765933; x=1813301933; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Tq/dT8JFO6HS4UbFJa31X6TBwZiDgp2XMEg0iJqJqF4=; b=dCELgPZpqXqEpVs05XbxHohhJ/YajbA5O62q52MsGCCY59vSRQNTD6CL zsmZF6LcerG9EtBjnXvct7RFXvTT7QekSOBZOM4XDtKblM2X4h9xn3dPE +Wgj2pvUwpdliXT31Ksm7819uX4SuEuqVS7g18iZqW8vCj7MsIILRTmMn R9IzoM6H81V0KAEafp9oI5RXV7V8h9B4xWltphIM9tJXvaotuJm7Wk/vy qsnAOO+E2AXqslkfhsy820RrGpUNAiLXfKnFGehTW3Na5DcfnLZNzokG4 kVA/4YKHO3SYTHL2ecsedET/tsKXUvMrpUZmfK6k6G7n43g+si5m1LS9e Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: hRVOOnYTSbqrhjhJhPkfqg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: C6oLX4mISC6dhgx4skqCIw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11820"; a="93191391" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,211,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="93191391" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jun 2026 23:58:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SFCaozCfTwinXXvlheVnRA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: hQTWXFcPSUS+AnFaSFHkpg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.24,211,1774335600"; d="scan'208";a="247138515" Received: from ettammin-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.10]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jun 2026 23:58:51 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:58:48 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tomasz Duszynski Cc: andy@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, jic23@kernel.org, m32285159@gmail.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iio: chemical: sps30: update email Message-ID: References: <20260617172138.114572-1-tduszyns@gmail.com> <20260617172715.115019-1-tduszyns@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260617172715.115019-1-tduszyns@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 07:27:15PM +0200, Tomasz Duszynski wrote: > The old email has been inactive for a while. Replace all occurrences > with the current address. ... > .mailmap | 1 + > drivers/iio/chemical/sps30_i2c.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/iio/chemical/sps30_serial.c | 4 ++-- I don't care much, but the cleaner approach is to have a separate patch for .mailmap and put it at the end of the series. Otherwise it's confusing that it's related to a certain driver, while changes are applied across the whole tree. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko