From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA343353A96; Sat, 8 Aug 2026 20:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786219965; cv=none; b=d5FDt2AFDpxFbB9WrLVCn7t1b90uF2uGzsxiYRsQFzjpKfy8c58j2j+Hi0gFWLiDy1QnSIQLOcTtC8n6G+rivlslvOtyrkD1K2CPoVNnTxTAjOLuC9+kJ+CFHXllxnwamhOfnPlfgpHNvuZcr9rphxbYesIKnBgRdKPrSoT9hVg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786219965; c=relaxed/simple; bh=AM1Tb1OylvXbJreir7NeXrSsS8YJgenYu6SmiEiPh0Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sx4cMdPFNiUVbNED8kK0wyiGbME7aZxyMJV3Yq2VLFptX5c1iYmFpT8ZZ2t+Aag9A4dXMuzpZ0JE+RkMDxTHrKedEjImEJOehg6PUcNWeCFZr1Tm89o045K4TzWlIecjS0jsbxsJI1wgkn3DYxD2raqLT9QX5lHiw6vdbASR/T0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=iFctcFiA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="iFctcFiA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1786219963; x=1817755963; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=AM1Tb1OylvXbJreir7NeXrSsS8YJgenYu6SmiEiPh0Y=; b=iFctcFiApCOAqbrBX8p4SA+ySOXyQiRCCmosvRBfZ6AAKPaZzKMpB85J NSCD3YpJ8qbXVwr8VcIbmI9iDs+X/qMG3ODNIKbEWpf2S+NlrbjO4WrBZ C7ozPS0GA9fuW7t1MAaOEux8xS+DGAZTq28QLcriwZK2ROonmZtolqb7R zh+cIA05wa73fPN54NjtpYVXxWne2Qp2tIih7oN/4ZAZ5i6H3AWirnUEa EcDMm3PT/0lPhQlCvx9NE6Z5WX+m4AsFsEZQvkLnZMwPDQUAeqrYFDPea dZXDTHv0BWoe1I5LmXAdjTm/zmSB03yw6pMSVMMHEL9HcaOZ0fs4rSFbN g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ju07z0IFQyi0vv3eLQGM5Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CfmR2JkNQ6iaN4ZVsRdAbQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11869"; a="86646570" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,212,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="86646570" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2026 13:12:42 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: is/d15nXTTqUB3mporthjg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: thKKXUJWSn63wRlkdMPwYg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,212,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="292583402" Received: from slindbla-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.2]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Aug 2026 13:12:39 -0700 Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2026 23:12:37 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mohamad Raizudeen Cc: jic23@kernel.org, dlechner@baylibre.com, andy@kernel.org, nuno.sa@analog.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joshua.crofts1@gmail.com, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, me@brighamcampbell.com, jkoolstra@xs4all.nl, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] staging: iio: frequency: ad9832/ad9834: add comment explaining do_div usage Message-ID: References: <20260807094704.5371-1-raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260807094704.5371-1-raizudeen.kerneldev@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 03:17:03PM +0530, Mohamad Raizudeen wrote: > Previous attempts to change do_div() to div64_ul were rejected because > mclk will always fit within 32 fits for this hardware, making do_div() > safe to use. > > However, Coccinelle continues to flag this as a false positive. To > prevent future developers from submitting unnecessary fixes, add a > comment explaining why do_div() is intentionally kept. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko