Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Gabriel Rondon <grondon@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	andy@kernel.org, "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Stepan Ionichev" <sozdayvek@gmail.com>,
	"Maxwell Doose" <m32285159@gmail.com>,
	"Yash Suthar" <yashsuthar983@gmail.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: accel: bmc150: use guard(mutex) for mutex handling
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:47:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoR-rPWNMrqlFv2q@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818154135.3324-1-grondon@gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 04:41:35PM +0100, Gabriel Rondon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 06:39:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Not directly related to this change, but even in the original code what is
> > protected here by the mutex? data->scan.channels?
> 
> Agreed it is out of scope for this cleanup, so I left the scope unchanged.
> 
> Honest answer: not much that is obvious. data->scan.channels does not need
> it, since the triggered handler is the only writer and the core serializes
> it. The accel one-shot read is already gated with -EBUSY while buffering, so
> bmc150_accel_get_axis cannot race the handler. What is left sharing
> data->mutex and still reachable during capture is the temperature read, the
> bandwidth get/set and scale set, and the event config. But since the handler
> is a single regmap_bulk_read and regmap already serializes the bus, it is not
> clear the driver mutex guards a real invariant here, and it may well be
> vestigial.

> Dropping it is a behavioral change worth its own patch and testing rather
> than something to fold into a lock-syntax cleanup.

Of course! Just made an observation.

> Happy to look into that separately.

If you have HW to test, I would like to see such a change.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-18 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-16 23:42 [PATCH v4 0/3] iio: accel: bmc150: fix event-enable race, then use guard(mutex) Gabriel Rondon
2026-08-16 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] iio: accel: bmc150: sort header inclusions alphabetically Gabriel Rondon
2026-08-17 15:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-16 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] iio: accel: bmc150: take the lock before checking ev_enable_state Gabriel Rondon
2026-08-16 23:42 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: accel: bmc150: use guard(mutex) for mutex handling Gabriel Rondon
2026-08-17 15:39   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-18 15:41     ` Gabriel Rondon
2026-08-18 15:47       ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aoR-rPWNMrqlFv2q@ashevche-desk.local \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=grondon@gmail.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m32285159@gmail.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=sozdayvek@gmail.com \
    --cc=yashsuthar983@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox