From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6452391507; Thu, 3 Sep 2026 07:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788422165; cv=none; b=F9pncYO7VXY7vE19aZjRoZ1aL/1CH2tYQo7w1yGiJ+OTk6aVVwGts9Wr4Fm8sAGFzCZN17lsI3nEEC15M9BbyZJlx7o76yfHuw8gwy/sLRXpHPARFzU8mFfzBZwCNAhEsPd5Cap2XKPkNyGv3rL3C386/wEoqkxws6QkpGR7koo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788422165; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KBBHEWALH09/aeugiqOEMRwOfgwx+Kf2hlkPG5RTIjU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q4/ott4ImbTfrc1MFbd+Ht1pNOJ6KmVf2xZRtPbJKRhZicyypz0pj3i3NTxCFZ1neGpjUpLzXqpCDahDll7qRUInNhaEugCh1QbxHYw2ZLFjThJVB4hj53uUq3MyHSn3Lr32t0RGr/9Rd4nh+ppaM0DlmJMwTZMu9Juy70TIw1Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gzrVRlCr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gzrVRlCr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1788422164; x=1819958164; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=KBBHEWALH09/aeugiqOEMRwOfgwx+Kf2hlkPG5RTIjU=; b=gzrVRlCrZeRdOdRfOpWQuMjCrd5YMMuL1Cko+mIvaINDIq/uCqApzyVE cVZhDiwzJsg0GO8Ng7N5X5bj1rvNApFS7owV2R0CJ5X5ODG6YsAkvcyDj cNubdgHCYFvVmNX0kmAxGbjizQ5k9ca0jfoWblMCyuRmMMMC2tytj8WNX Deon4kFHrkEBwqlFLstrOg5XvC2VfmsjAw08lOP5R52Abe8hnkbC0V9H4 W4d+zRoimdeJGB3uh3K/86uf6MDp9Jd8dP+aYv7knI/ARfck8wyt20OHh 8yEfqRhVq1P6HUAi8CnULCBmMkty+vrkPmvY1US3sO34ExQ80c/eJS4AZ g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2hjLVtXkSNyOSnskTcmO4Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: EPnaEme5QBOdie1CpD37kQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11894"; a="99555891" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,258,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="99555891" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 00:56:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: t2/+K6XMQ0qf/QyZ9rKgmg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FhWDUmJXR/ippXWbjMs27w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,258,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="293144911" Received: from smoticic-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.28]) by fmviesa002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2026 00:56:01 -0700 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 10:55:59 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Tsz Shan Chan Cc: Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tsz Shan Chan Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] iio: light: vcnl4000: use correct channel array size Message-ID: References: <20260903-vcnl4000-v3-0-5e69c2e715a8@jacques.com.au> <20260903-vcnl4000-v3-1-5e69c2e715a8@jacques.com.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260903-vcnl4000-v3-1-5e69c2e715a8@jacques.com.au> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 02:53:46PM +1000, Tsz Shan Chan wrote: > vcnl4200_spec sets .channel to vcnl4040_channels but .num_channels uses > ARRAY_SIZE(vcnl4000_channels). Use ARRAY_SIZE(vcnl4040_channels) so > num_channels matches .channels. > > Both arrays have the same size. No behaviour change. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko