* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
[not found] <20250703163824.2f08d866@canb.auug.org.au>
@ 2025-07-03 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-03 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, David Lechner
Cc: Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
>
> MAINTAINERS
>
> between commit:
>
> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
>
> from the spi tree and commit:
>
> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
>
> from the iio tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Thanks Stephen,
David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
will resolve this however he prefers!
Jonathan
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
> S: Maintained
> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
>
> + TRIGGER SOURCE
> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> + S: Maintained
> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> +
> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> +S: Maintained
> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
> +
> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> - S: Maintained
> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> -
> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
2025-07-03 8:31 ` linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree Jonathan Cameron
@ 2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner
2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Lechner @ 2025-07-03 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> MAINTAINERS
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
>>
>> from the spi tree and commit:
>>
>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
>>
>> from the iio tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>>
> Thanks Stephen,
>
> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
one section like this.
I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
the reset to keep things compact.
>
> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
>
> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
> will resolve this however he prefers!
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Stephen Rothwell
>>
>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
>> S: Maintained
>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
>>
>> + TRIGGER SOURCE
>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>> + S: Maintained
>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
>> +
>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>> +S: Maintained
>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
>> +
>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>> - S: Maintained
>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
>> -
>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner
@ 2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-06 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Lechner
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell, Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500
David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
> > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> >>
> >> MAINTAINERS
> >>
> >> between commit:
> >>
> >> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
> >>
> >> from the spi tree and commit:
> >>
> >> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
> >>
> >> from the iio tree.
> >>
> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> >> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> >> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> >> complex conflicts.
> >>
> > Thanks Stephen,
> >
> > David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
>
> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
> one section like this.
>
> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
> the reset to keep things compact.
>
Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are
coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle
and tidy up next?
> >
> > I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
> > more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
> >
> > We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
> > will resolve this however he prefers!
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Stephen Rothwell
> >>
> >> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> >> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
> >> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
> >> S: Maintained
> >> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
> >> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
> >>
> >> + TRIGGER SOURCE
> >> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >> + S: Maintained
> >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
> >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >> +
> >> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
> >> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >> +S: Maintained
> >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
> >> +
> >> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
> >> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >> - S: Maintained
> >> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >> -
> >> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
> >> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
@ 2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner
2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Lechner @ 2025-07-06 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron
Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell, Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500
> David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
>> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
>>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
>>>>
>>>> MAINTAINERS
>>>>
>>>> between commit:
>>>>
>>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
>>>>
>>>> from the spi tree and commit:
>>>>
>>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
>>>>
>>>> from the iio tree.
>>>>
>>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
>>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>>>> complex conflicts.
>>>>
>>> Thanks Stephen,
>>>
>>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
>>
>> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
>> one section like this.
>>
>> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
>> the reset to keep things compact.
>>
> Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are
> coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle
> and tidy up next?
Agree, waiting seems the simplest option.
>
>>>
>>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
>>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
>>>
>>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
>>> will resolve this however he prefers!
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Stephen Rothwell
>>>>
>>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
>>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
>>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
>>>> S: Maintained
>>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
>>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
>>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
>>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
>>>>
>>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE
>>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>>>> + S: Maintained
>>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
>>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
>>>> +
>>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
>>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>>>> +S: Maintained
>>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
>>>> +
>>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
>>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
>>>> - S: Maintained
>>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
>>>> -
>>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
>>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner
@ 2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-07-21 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Brown, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: David Lechner, Jonathan Cameron, Jonathan Cameron,
Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3692 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:15:14 -0500 David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500
> > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
> >>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> >>>>
> >>>> MAINTAINERS
> >>>>
> >>>> between commit:
> >>>>
> >>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
> >>>>
> >>>> from the spi tree and commit:
> >>>>
> >>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
> >>>>
> >>>> from the iio tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> >>>> complex conflicts.
> >>>>
> >>> Thanks Stephen,
> >>>
> >>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
> >>
> >> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
> >> one section like this.
> >>
> >> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
> >> the reset to keep things compact.
> >>
> > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are
> > coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle
> > and tidy up next?
>
> Agree, waiting seems the simplest option.
>
> >
> >>>
> >>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
> >>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
> >>>
> >>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
> >>> will resolve this however he prefers!
> >>>
> >>> Jonathan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Stephen Rothwell
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> >>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
> >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
> >>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
> >>>> S: Maintained
> >>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
> >>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> >>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
> >>>>
> >>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE
> >>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >>>> + S: Maintained
> >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
> >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >>>> +
> >>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
> >>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >>>> +S: Maintained
> >>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
> >>>> +
> >>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
> >>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> >>>> - S: Maintained
> >>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> >>>> -
> >>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
> >>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the spi tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-24 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Mark Brown, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann, David Lechner,
Jonathan Cameron, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:55:45 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:15:14 -0500 David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500
> > > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000
> > >>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> MAINTAINERS
> > >>>>
> > >>>> between commit:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
> > >>>>
> > >>>> from the spi tree and commit:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
> > >>>>
> > >>>> from the iio tree.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > >>>> complex conflicts.
> > >>>>
> > >>> Thanks Stephen,
> > >>>
> > >>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries?
> > >>
> > >> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made
> > >> one section like this.
> > >>
> > >> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with
> > >> the reset to keep things compact.
> > >>
> > > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are
> > > coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle
> > > and tidy up next?
> >
> > Agree, waiting seems the simplest option.
> >
> > >
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the
> > >>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order.
> > >>>
> > >>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus
> > >>> will resolve this however he prefers!
> > >>>
> > >>> Jonathan
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Stephen Rothwell
> > >>>>
> > >>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS
> > >>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
> > >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > >>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
> > >>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
> > >>>> S: Maintained
> > >>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
> > >>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> > >>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
> > >>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE
> > >>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> > >>>> + S: Maintained
> > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
> > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> > >>>> +
> > >>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
> > >>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> > >>>> +S: Maintained
> > >>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
> > >>>> +
> > >>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
> > >>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> > >>>> - S: Maintained
> > >>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
> > >>>> -
> > >>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
> > >>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > >>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
>
> This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the spi tree.
Ah. Sorry Greg, I meant to mention this in the pull request.
In earlier discussion we concluded that best bet was to let it resolve as
separate entries (as Stephen has) and then we'll clean it up next cycle
if it makes sense to unify more of them.
Thanks Stephen for dealing with our mess!
Jonathan
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-24 13:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20250703163824.2f08d866@canb.auug.org.au>
2025-07-03 8:31 ` linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner
2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner
2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).