From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Support ROHM BD797xx DACs
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:12:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b77155e4-9f60-42f5-94db-1d2e4c0aed55@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250405181838.1498be04@jic23-huawei>
On 05/04/2025 20:18, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:44:20 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Support ROHM BD797xx DACs
>>
>> ROHM BD79700, BD79701 and BD79702 are very similar to the already
>> sipported BD79703. Main difference is the reduced number of channels.
> supported.
>> Also, the *00 and *01 variants lack of the separate Vfs pin.
>>
>> This series adds support for the BD79700, BD79701 and BD79702.
>
> Series was nearly perfect but I tweaked one thing...
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Matti Vaittinen (5):
>> dt-bindings: Add ROHM BD7970x variants
>> iio: dac: bd79703 Store device address to 'address'
>> dac: bd79703: Add chip data
>> iio: bd79703: Support BD79700 and BD79701
>> iio: dac: bd79703: Support ROHM BD79702
> Made the last 4 patch titles all start with
> iio: dac: bd79703:
> rather than this random mixture of prefixes.
Oh! Thanks! "iio: dac:" is obviously the right prefix for all of them!
> Applied to the testing branch of iio.git which will get rebase
> on rc1 sometime in next few days.
Yours,
-- Matti
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-07 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-02 6:44 [PATCH 0/5] Support ROHM BD797xx DACs Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-02 6:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: Add ROHM BD7970x variants Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-02 13:27 ` Conor Dooley
2025-04-02 6:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] iio: dac: bd79703 Store device address to 'address' Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-02 6:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] dac: bd79703: Add chip data Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-02 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] iio: bd79703: Support BD79700 and BD79701 Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-02 6:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] iio: dac: bd79703: Support ROHM BD79702 Matti Vaittinen
2025-04-05 17:18 ` [PATCH 0/5] Support ROHM BD797xx DACs Jonathan Cameron
2025-04-07 5:12 ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b77155e4-9f60-42f5-94db-1d2e4c0aed55@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox