From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E0E130A4D for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 07:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719990428; cv=none; b=f9SO4hvTK/PCu0Lo5Lb1pCKEPvtlkS3OwzwLSJet6NaCCIFMvPHavRZfWkV8hl0wJZum55RQZXtgbDedikMhpg80rFx619Cpv+QN5kRIQyNMz/PxU3NHTyC9nBtNnKfNDzAFSMh9x6tiqAFR+BClNgooJPTDXEoGyD1gtNq6aTo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719990428; c=relaxed/simple; bh=94/YiQevyIJ6f5oF+UZGXc3nPNCmtYJQcSbSpFNU7Ns=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=Uav1YUzq9mkUP1taODGBJ6t+vDTsjOChfZOR2d4hq/vl/IfnVdVK821iTFgQTKijHkn8Unauj6TFMRE7/HnWo81Y8Kgtzev+qMgbj5fm1FC2XJ+EK0IReKAffPcRb3pHV2Nq911a3k0P4J8pqdaPjrEQZtNNz683r/ieiFe9wik= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=YQ3xXZN/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YQ3xXZN/" Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-36701e6c6e8so2595115f8f.1 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719990426; x=1720595226; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=94/YiQevyIJ6f5oF+UZGXc3nPNCmtYJQcSbSpFNU7Ns=; b=YQ3xXZN/UIECIruvckZiuotYiHdEjXszqhedmo0k0xlfJRjJCMbr6irxn4nsV02vYr 2XvN6/FDvRtvBahqJCko/QAxmybTCQEMN1TcVZioB41rqe4WOW8GiitCUDcA6aMReV8v GVwghIew/sERZHtwogEwzjwWFz2Ojqgj+iz4x9B88u/5u/22o8b695L6RToa7H6xyi8w pdFue5YQH9rcNYXLvPq7FwzhfKhRSbRe3n0KWzSmsABgi5t1KK+oln4fkT6nmT2d9zn4 kKZT40/7wWQOE0fKoMrt/MC9+Zf+8c/2NA77Dm4kdjyocnTAMYvz97t5a64hUKjsqU8P CHrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719990426; x=1720595226; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=94/YiQevyIJ6f5oF+UZGXc3nPNCmtYJQcSbSpFNU7Ns=; b=CF7sSCL8kkz39S6TycxBj2HAMw1XoTxNIwdhXjXret5wrW7UJfeCi9JdGlX+nyFmx5 7m6cxkTCKdxo8ZRb6Egc2qXLN789fO5NgR7iYbcMQxUs+ig61sazRBG3CDTfPaDUOVMQ i3RBFdkV+KTMCVx+7KMrv4Co1ZdGzhumd1i17xKPHeq58hGTPRW/UuYjtocDJIRvV3Xr ul55kYkyoSkD9vABF5Bn5tYIJVrZ1kRI6uPJPE6vEj9adTcfj3t4UQ4WhMf5Z0g8rK9W ZCszrhZvaBzWCvXTWGkYi7/TXAqGws6jYXyaiP78CMM6sy9xs9mZUpyiqw0v+e0hkqzj vYLw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW3AxC0FfCG0n7wneG4w5ItC7UAi3nLxK9AkVp2i76um9lq1JqmGjvYcf8Th1mPjDKAyAR52IKYdw7NvAfHm1phv9QX1lSr3l8G X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEAyIIA98XFqt5uOnaC2LEQwAuh51nGF70Yh8zd02RzW28dBoi oFb+2SMt43JbrjnO/1aJDtglZL1ztAArPv+G986IWO/vl7gnAW27lt48IEz5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE7bT6cMVZUlOrcczuiH3P+xPe2/ItQj4QMgGAX8UbgshHV5ACRpsWC3AW25jDa7wzoDssy3Q== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e782:0:b0:362:bb3e:93da with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-367757282c1mr6854744f8f.62.1719990425492; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:f6:ef1c:c500:ee59:d953:f148:40ba? (p200300f6ef1cc500ee59d953f14840ba.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:f6:ef1c:c500:ee59:d953:f148:40ba]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3675a0d91fesm15226681f8f.40.2024.07.03.00.07.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jul 2024 00:07:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] iio: make masklength __private (round 1) From: Nuno =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= To: Jonathan Cameron , Nuno Sa via B4 Relay Cc: nuno.sa@analog.com, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Cosmin Tanislav , Michael Hennerich , Benson Leung , Guenter Roeck , Dmitry Rokosov , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Claudiu Beznea Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 09:10:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240702212652.01241fc2@jic23-huawei> References: <20240702-dev-iio-masklength-private-v1-0-98193bf536a6@analog.com> <20240702212652.01241fc2@jic23-huawei> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 21:26 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:02:32 +0200 > Nuno Sa via B4 Relay wrote: >=20 > > Hi Jonathan, > >=20 > > Here it goes the first round of what we discussed in [1] about > > annotating .masklength as __private. Patches should be fairly simple so > > hopefully I did not messed up much... > >=20 > > Note that in core, there's one place where we're still directly writing > > into .masklength (when it's effectively set). The plan is then to > > directly use ACCESS_PRIVATE() in there in the same patch where we mark > > .masklength as __private. >=20 > Makes sense. Series looks good to me, but I'll not pick it up just yet. > I've tagged a like second 6.11 pull request, so this is probably 6.12 mat= erial > unless things go particularly smoothly and Greg takes an additional last > minute one as there is one set waiting for a fix that is in char-misc > but not yet iio-togreg. >=20 > Jonathan >=20 Yeah, looks sane to me. Advantage of going in 6.12 is that (likely) we'' ge= t all the conversions done. - Nuno S=C3=A1 >=20