From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com (fllv0015.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C75C19DF78; Wed, 29 May 2024 17:20:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.141 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717003249; cv=none; b=PdHxrUkD4Iz1zp9A7cD5jx7sEMiVb25/HkpG/a+cYpy4dJmecW52G5XiFhuICwT5CqA8jUCzmlzl2a3N1SqH7pJU/VFUfLB+iV6YtIiR/Hp1kA//qAKwU1cOQxGQkvciqFIEd4vAlo1ViGvAhErruEwTbk2kmTdohTVQBgx7ZBg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717003249; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6op9aP1HVmzyG+C85+rhjJ60b1XUCq/6cWTD4G15NhU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VIwgB1PnSS7HsfY4AsLpVZFAWGg4fjn3lFemq4mgVz07JJqMJiijjpNtHb4ckZWjCYeCs4Qfuwd9Ytcs5MI0IWHpuLKOkw3Lor52jyLxwQtzZDtDqZO9fTnEVO/QAHKK1s0LvrMOje7mj3SdpDkqz9J+HJXynF57l+Zo/rfihkU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=jY3e22WL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.19.141 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="jY3e22WL" Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44THJogj124014; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1717003190; bh=AuBUGle0djl+XDtipQHjTVnybdvyAQCUf4F3ToP1+yQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=jY3e22WLdWpR2oXGbMwsRofdEsP9no/g8KcXqdVoLjjlu8yqxDN03cUEM7Ifl+sms qtfpOAPfjAZg0a4L8ZcoyCOgiO2IhSFi5fpmMaVihjzCRAlvAoby5HTfMCQabZ9C/T r1vpjg7H0pKJm/XDRRyxSF1SvMz1qlsFVGUNvp/w= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 44THJoWj089849 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:50 -0500 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:49 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.249) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:50 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.105] (judy-hp.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.105]) by lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 44THJnHg116710; Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:49 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:49 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible To: Conor Dooley CC: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , William Breathitt Gray , David Lechner , , , , , Nishanth Menon , Vignesh Raghavendra References: <20240523231516.545085-1-jm@ti.com> <20240523231516.545085-3-jm@ti.com> <20240524-wrecker-busybody-2c082b87ddef@spud> <57e4f7b1-2955-4dd5-b9d9-f3b1f27aab75@ti.com> <20240525-tall-cultural-1a3f181d39ac@spud> Content-Language: en-US From: Judith Mendez In-Reply-To: <20240525-tall-cultural-1a3f181d39ac@spud> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Hi Conor, On 5/25/24 10:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:30:32PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: >> On 5/24/24 1:38 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:15:10PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: >>>> Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device >>>> uses this compatible, require power-domains property. >>>> >>>> Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep, >>>> clock-names is not really required. The clock-name also changed >>>> for TI K3 SoCs so make clock-names optional for the new compatible >>>> since there is only one clock that is routed to the IP. >>> >>> Really the clock should be named after the function it has in the IP >>> block - it looks like "sysoutclk" is more likely the name of the clock >>> routed to the IP rather than the role it has? >> >> It is the name of the clock, though id like to keep sysclkout for >> backwards compatibility, even though the name is confusing. > > FWIW, I was not suggesting that it be renamed. Understood, thanks. > > Thanks, > Conor.