From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:59283 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbdJZRJb (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 13:09:31 -0400 Subject: Re: iio/accel/stk8ba50: Use common error handling code in stk8ba50_probe() To: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Tiberiu Breana , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <5ab7e200-2dea-63e2-06db-0e185f563d16@users.sourceforge.net> <0f26a13b-7bbf-525b-a864-8aa8e13c3aef@users.sourceforge.net> <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 19:09:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-iio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org > Again, a general kernel development rule is to float only one > patch of a given type until you have had feedback on it. Some update suggestions according also to this general source code transformation pattern were already integrated in other software areas. > These backwards goto cases are sufficiently different from your earlier > patch that got reviews that, They are required if you would ever like to support software refactorings in directions which I propose occasionally. > at most, you should have sent one to the list and then given time > for it to be properly reviewed (up to a week on IIO list typically). Did I present my ideas a bit too quick in this case? Regards, Markus