public inbox for linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Cc: "Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: use spi_optimize_message()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:29:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d14d23df-0fad-4b87-8e57-67241b29fc30@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad4OywqHDC7aYapD@ashevche-desk.local>

On 4/14/26 4:54 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 05:13:33PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
>> Use spi_optimize_message() to reduce CPU usage during buffered reads.
>>
>> On hardware with support for SPI_CS_WORD, this reduced the CPU usage
>> of the threaded interrupt by about 5%. On hardware without support, this
>> should reduce CPU usage even more since it won't have to split the SPI
>> transfers each time the interrupt handler is called.
>>
>> The update_scan_mode callback hand to be moved to the buffer preenable

s/hand/had/

>> callback since the SPI transfer mode can't be changed after
>> spi_optimize_message() has been called. (The buffer postenable callback
>> can't be used because it happens after the trigger is enabled, so the
>> SPI message needs to be optimized before that.)
>>
>> The indent of ti_ads7950_read_raw is changed since there is no longer
>> anything else in the struct to align with since we removed
>> ti_ads7950_update_scan_mode.
> 
> Some of the func() are mentioned w/o parentheses and I got lost which one is
> which. Also callbacks usually mentioned as .callback() (with a leading dot).

I didn't put () in the last paragraph because I was talking about the function
pointer, not the function. I guess I missed update_scan_mode() though.

> 
> The second paragraph doesn't tell me clearly if there is a behaviour change
> from user perspective.
> 

It is not clear that the difference the user can notice is that there are
some CPU cycles freed up for other tasks?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-14 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-11 22:13 [PATCH] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: use spi_optimize_message() David Lechner
2026-04-14  9:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-14 13:29   ` David Lechner [this message]
2026-04-14 16:31     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-04-14 17:52       ` David Lechner
2026-04-20 13:03         ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d14d23df-0fad-4b87-8e57-67241b29fc30@baylibre.com \
    --to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox