From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: hid-sensor-trigger: Fix sometimes not powering up the sensor after resume
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 07:22:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc28cdda-7e80-1d77-dd29-714b87eb0cbd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523831646.3792.1.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 16-04-18 00:34, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 15:58 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 17:09:09 +0200
>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> hid_sensor_set_power_work() powers the sensors back up after a
>>> resume
>>> based on the user_requested_state atomic_t.
>>>
>>> But hid_sensor_power_state() treats this as a boolean flag, leading
>>> to
>>> the following problematic scenario:
>>>
>>> 1) Some app starts using the iio-sensor in buffered / triggered
>>> mode,
>>> hid_sensor_data_rdy_trigger_set_state(true) gets called, setting
>>> user_requested_state to 1.
>>> 2) Something directly accesses a _raw value through sysfs, leading
>>> to a call to hid_sensor_power_state(true) followed by
>>> hid_sensor_power_state(false) call, this sets
>>> user_requested_state
>>> to 1 followed by setting it to 0.
>>> 3) Suspend/resume the machine, hid_sensor_set_power_work() now does
>>> NOT power the sensor back up because user_requested_state
>>> (wrongly)
>>> is 0. Which stops the app using the sensor in buffered mode from
>>> receiving any new values.
>>>
>>> This commit changes user_requested_state to a counter tracking how
>>> many
>>> times hid_sensor_power_state(true) was called instead, fixing this.
>>>
>>> Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
>>> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
>
> Which App is doing like this?
No app, just something I noticed while manually testing the
accelerometer while iio-sensor-proxy was also active.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
>
>
>>
>> Looks sensible to me.
>>
>> I'll give it a few days at least though for others to comment.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
>>> b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
>>> index cfb6588565ba..4905a997a7ec 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/common/hid-sensors/hid-sensor-trigger.c
>>> @@ -178,14 +178,14 @@ int hid_sensor_power_state(struct
>>> hid_sensor_common *st, bool state)
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> - atomic_set(&st->user_requested_state, state);
>>> -
>>> if (atomic_add_unless(&st->runtime_pm_enable, 1, 1))
>>> pm_runtime_enable(&st->pdev->dev);
>>>
>>> - if (state)
>>> + if (state) {
>>> + atomic_inc(&st->user_requested_state);
>>> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&st->pdev->dev);
>>> - else {
>>> + } else {
>>> + atomic_dec(&st->user_requested_state);
>>> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&st->pdev->dev);
>>> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&st->pdev->dev);
>>> ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&st->pdev->dev);
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-16 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-14 15:09 [PATCH] iio: hid-sensor-trigger: Fix sometimes not powering up the sensor after resume Hans de Goede
2018-04-15 14:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-04-15 22:34 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-04-16 5:22 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2018-04-21 14:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dc28cdda-7e80-1d77-dd29-714b87eb0cbd@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).