From: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Paul Gazzillo <paul@pgazz.com>,
Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@collabora.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] iio: light: ROHM BU27034 Ambient Light Sensor
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:38:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eeb96226-2ad6-954c-7054-b4762942ac0d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230408122140.25332d15@jic23-huawei>
On 4/8/23 14:21, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:41:58 +0300
> Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ROHM BU27034 is an ambient light sensor with 3 channels and 3 photo diodes
>> capable of detecting a very wide range of illuminance. Typical application
>> is adjusting LCD and backlight power of TVs and mobile phones.
>>
>> Add initial support for the ROHM BU27034 ambient light sensor.
>>
>> NOTE:
>> - Driver exposes 4 channels. One IIO_LIGHT channel providing the
>> calculated lux values based on measured data from diodes #0 and
>> #1. In addition, 3 IIO_INTENSITY channels are emitting the raw
>> register data from all diodes for more intense user-space
>> computations.
>> - Sensor has GAIN values that can be adjusted from 1x to 4096x.
>> - Sensor has adjustible measurement times of 5, 55, 100, 200 and
>> 400 mS. Driver does not support 5 mS which has special
>> limitations.
>> - Driver exposes standard 'scale' adjustment which is
>> implemented by:
>> 1) Trying to adjust only the GAIN
>> 2) If GAIN adjustment alone can't provide requested
>> scale, adjusting both the time and the gain is
>> attempted.
>> - Driver exposes writable INT_TIME property that can be used
>> for adjusting the measurement time. Time adjustment will also
>> cause the driver to try to adjust the GAIN so that the
>> overall scale is kept as close to the original as possible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
>
> A few trivial comments inline but nothing that stops me applying this version.
>
>>
>> +static int bu27034_read_raw(struct iio_dev *idev,
>> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
>> + int *val, int *val2, long mask)
>> +{
>> + struct bu27034_data *data = iio_priv(idev);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + switch (mask) {
>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_INT_TIME:
>> + *val = bu27034_get_int_time(data);
>> + if (*val < 0)
>> + return *val;
>> +
>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> +
>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
>> + return bu27034_get_scale(data, chan->channel, val, val2);
>> +
>> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
>> + {
>> + int (*result_get)(struct bu27034_data *data, int chan, int *val);
>
> I don't care that much about this, but the function pointer dance seems
> unnecessary.
My memory is getting worse and worse over the time... It's hard for me
to remember why I added a function pointer here - but it probably was to
keep the if-else if-else construct out of the mutex-protected section.
>
> You could probably also drop the paranoid checking (or default to one of the
> choices).
If this was done, then the function-pointer had no use. If you think the
check is paranoid, then I agree, we should go with the suggestion you
have below.
>
> So at call sight of result_get() currently have
> if (chan->type == IIO_INTENSITY)
> ret = bu27034_get_single-result()...
> else
> ret = bu27034_get_mlux()
>
> etc
>
> meh. I didn't raise it earlier so I'll leave this alone.
>
>> +
>> + if (chan->type == IIO_INTENSITY)
>> + result_get = bu27034_get_single_result;
>> + else if (chan->type == IIO_LIGHT)
>> + result_get = bu27034_get_mlux;
>> + else
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + /* Don't mess with measurement enabling while buffering */
>> + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(idev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&data->mutex);
>> + /*
>> + * Reading one channel at a time is inefficient but we
>> + * don't care here. Buffered version should be used if
>> + * performance is an issue.
>> + */
>> + ret = result_get(data, chan->channel, val);
>> +
>> + mutex_unlock(&data->mutex);
>> + iio_device_release_direct_mode(idev);
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + return IIO_VAL_INT;
>> + }
>> + default:
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I will fix the excess blank line above though. Serves no purpose
> so gone in the version I applied.
Thanks!
Yours,
-- Matti
--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland
~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-10 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-31 12:40 [PATCH v7 0/5] Support ROHM BU27034 ALS sensor Matti Vaittinen
2023-03-31 12:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] iio: light: Add gain-time-scale helpers Matti Vaittinen
2023-03-31 12:41 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] MAINTAINERS: Add IIO " Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-01 17:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-03-31 12:41 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: Support ROHM BU27034 Matti Vaittinen
2023-03-31 12:41 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] iio: light: ROHM BU27034 Ambient Light Sensor Matti Vaittinen
2023-04-08 11:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2023-04-10 10:38 ` Matti Vaittinen [this message]
2023-04-12 11:55 ` Vaittinen, Matti
2023-03-31 12:42 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BU27034 Matti Vaittinen
2024-03-04 12:38 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] Support ROHM BU27034 ALS sensor Matti Vaittinen
2024-03-09 17:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-03-11 9:15 ` Matti Vaittinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eeb96226-2ad6-954c-7054-b4762942ac0d@gmail.com \
--to=mazziesaccount@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com \
--cc=paul@pgazz.com \
--cc=shreeya.patel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox