From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_iio/=e2=80=a6:_Use_common_error_handling_code?= To: Jonathan Cameron , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler References: <5ab7e200-2dea-63e2-06db-0e185f563d16@users.sourceforge.net> <0f26a13b-7bbf-525b-a864-8aa8e13c3aef@users.sourceforge.net> <20171026174200.5c00b06d@archlinux> <20171210160829.16128419@archlinux> From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:43:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171210160829.16128419@archlinux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-ID: > Hi Markus, I've accepted the ones that I think made an improvement > outweighing the inherent small costs of making any change. Does such a kind of feedback mean that you reconsidered any places where you expressed a rejection initially? > We also need to avoid code constructs that are unusual in error handling > such as backwards gotos. Why would you like to exclude this approach if anything useful could be achieved in the shown software design direction? > Note however that most of the changes made so far are only minor improvements. I agree that corresponding effects are small just because the discussed source code adjustments affected specific function implementations. > I am not saying I don't appreciate them, Thanks. > but rather than that they are of of low importance. A lot of details are competing also for our software development attention. Regards, Markus