From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de,
pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7793: use iio helper function to guarantee direct mode
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 12:42:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd48bc76-6c82-62dd-6781-cb01d2cf5d16@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160718193513.GA3862@d830.WORKGROUP>
On 18/07/16 20:35, Alison Schofield wrote:
> Replace the code that guarantees the device stays in direct mode
> with iio_device_claim_direct_mode() which does same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@gmail.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git.
> ---
> This driver is not doing any error checking on the code I just wrapped
> in device_claim/release. It first saves info to the global state and
> then writes it to a register, with no error checking.
>
> Does similar in both *write_raw, and *write_frequency.
>
> I could add error checking in another patch if it's desired. I don't have
> this sensor to verify. Let me know if that would be welcome. Thanks!
I'd be keen to see this cleaned up. Michael / Lars, can you easily test
such a change (or we could rely on it being simple enough that it shouldn't
be possible to get it wrong ;)
>
>
> drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c
> index 847789b..e6706a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7793.c
> @@ -519,11 +519,9 @@ static int ad7793_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> int ret, i;
> unsigned int tmp;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> - if (iio_buffer_enabled(indio_dev)) {
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> + ret = iio_device_claim_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> switch (mask) {
> case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> @@ -548,7 +546,7 @@ static int ad7793_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + iio_device_release_direct_mode(indio_dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-24 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 19:35 [PATCH] iio: adc: ad7793: use iio helper function to guarantee direct mode Alison Schofield
2016-07-24 11:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd48bc76-6c82-62dd-6781-cb01d2cf5d16@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=amsfield22@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).