From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Jiri Kosina" <jikos@kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Srinivas Pandruvada" <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
"Lars Möllendorf" <lars.moellendorf@plating.de>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Lixu Zhang <lixu.zhang@intel.com>,
Francesco Lavra <flavra@baylibre.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] iio: buffer: fix timestamp alignment (in rare case)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 14:15:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00213b587ae4f9bde11ec928081abb60ddbed09a.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260307-iio-fix-timestamp-alignment-v2-0-d1d48fbadbbf@baylibre.com>
On Sat, 2026-03-07 at 19:44 -0600, David Lechner wrote:
> In [1], it was pointed out that the iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp()
> function is not putting the timestamp at the correct offset in the scan
> buffer in rare cases where the largest scan element size is larger than
> sizeof(int64_t).
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260215162351.79f40b32@jic23-huawei/
>
> This only affected one driver, namely hid-sensor-rotation since it is
> the only driver that meets the condition. To fix things up, first we
> fix the hid-sensor-rotation driver in a way that preserves compatibility
> with the broken timestamp alignment. Then we are free to fix the core
> IIO code without affecting any users.
>
> The first patch depends on [2] which is now in iio/fixes-togreg. It
> should be OK to apply the first patch there and let the rest of the
> patches go through iio/togreg (the later patches are just preventing
> future bugs).
>
> [2]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20260228-iio-fix-repeat-alignment-v2-0-d58bfaa2920d@baylibre.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> ---
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
> Changes in v2:
> - Don't say "HACK" in comments.
> - Cache timestamp offset instead of largest scan element size.
> - New patch to ensure size/alignment is always power of 2 bytes.
> - Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260301-iio-fix-timestamp-alignment-v1-0-1a54980bfb90@baylibre.com
>
> ---
> David Lechner (5):
> iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: add timestamp hack to not break userspace
> iio: buffer: check return value of iio_compute_scan_bytes()
> iio: buffer: cache timestamp offset in scan buffer
> iio: buffer: ensure repeat alignment is a power of two
> iio: buffer: fix timestamp alignment when quaternion in scan
>
> drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-rotation.c | 22 +++++++++++--
> include/linux/iio/buffer.h | 12 +++++--
> include/linux/iio/iio.h | 3 ++
> 4 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 6f25a6105c41a7d6b12986dbe80ded396a5667f8
> change-id: 20260228-iio-fix-timestamp-alignment-89ade1af458b
> prerequisite-message-id: <20260228-iio-fix-repeat-alignment-v2-0-d58bfaa2920d@baylibre.com>
> prerequisite-patch-id: e155a526d57c5759a2fcfbfca7f544cb419addfd
> prerequisite-patch-id: 6c69eaad0dd2ae69bd2745e7d387f739fc1a9ba0
>
> Best regards,
> --
> David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-09 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-08 1:44 [PATCH v2 0/5] iio: buffer: fix timestamp alignment (in rare case) David Lechner
2026-03-08 1:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: add timestamp hack to not break userspace David Lechner
2026-03-14 12:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-03-08 1:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] iio: buffer: check return value of iio_compute_scan_bytes() David Lechner
2026-03-08 1:44 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] iio: buffer: cache timestamp offset in scan buffer David Lechner
2026-03-08 1:44 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] iio: buffer: ensure repeat alignment is a power of two David Lechner
2026-03-08 1:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] iio: buffer: fix timestamp alignment when quaternion in scan David Lechner
2026-03-09 14:15 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00213b587ae4f9bde11ec928081abb60ddbed09a.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=flavra@baylibre.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=lars.moellendorf@plating.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lixu.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox