linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
To: 'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@arndb.de>,
	'Ralf Baechle' <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	'Dmitry Torokhov' <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: 'Linus Walleij' <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	'Russell King - ARM Linux' <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	'Eric Miao' <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	'Sascha Hauer' <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	'Roland Stigge' <stigge@antcom.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Remove HAVE_PWM config option
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:02:21 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <007801cf26d5$aeaf3040$0c0d90c0$%han@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003901cf25fc$73002790$590076b0$%han@samsung.com>

On Monday, February 10, 2014 10:07 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> 
> The HAVE_PWM symbol is only for legacy platforms that provide
> the PWM API without using the generic framework, while PWM symbol
> is used for PWM drivers using the generic PWM framework.
> 
> I looked at all HAVE_PWMs in the latest mainline kernel 3.14-rc1.
> Three platforms are still using HAVE_PWM as below:
> 
> 1. ARM - PXA
>   ./arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig
> 
> 2. ARM - NXP LPC32XX
>   ./arch/arm/Kconfig
>   config ARCH_LPC32XX
>   	select HAVE_PWM
> 
> 3. MIPS - Ingenic JZ4740 based machines
>   ./arch/mips/Kconfig
>   config MACH_JZ4740
>   	select HAVE_PWM
> 
> However, the legacy PWM drivers for PXA, LPC32XX, and JZ474 were
> already moved to the generic PWM framework.
>   ./drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
>   ./drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c
>   ./drivers/pwm/pwm-jz4740.c
> 
> In conclusion, HAVE_PWM should be removed, because HAVE_PWM is
> NOT required anymore.
> 
> Jingoo Han (7):
>       ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
>       ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
>       ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
>       MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
>       Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
>       Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
>       pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
> 
>  arch/arm/Kconfig           |    4 ----
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/Kconfig  |   15 ---------------
>  arch/mips/Kconfig          |    1 -
>  drivers/input/misc/Kconfig |    4 ++--
>  include/linux/pwm.h        |    2 +-
>  5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

(+cc Sascha Hauer, Roland Stigge)

The same patch was already submitted by Sascha Hauer. [1]
So, please ignore this patch. Thank you.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/16/262

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> I would like to merge these patches as below:
> 
> 1. Through arm-soc tree
>   [PATCH 1/7] ARM: pxa: don't select HAVE_PWM
>   [PATCH 2/7] ARM: lpc32xx: don't select HAVE_PWM
>   [PATCH 3/7] ARM: remove HAVE_PWM config option
> 
> 2. Through MIPS tree
>   [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: jz4740: don't select HAVE_PWM
> 
> 3. Through Input tree
>   [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
>   [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies
> 
> 4. Through PWM tree
>   [PATCH 7/7] pwm: don't use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_PWM)
> 
> After merging these patches, all HAVE_PWM will be removed from
> the mainline kernel. Thank you. :-)
> 
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han


      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-11  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-10  1:07 [PATCH 0/7] Remove HAVE_PWM config option Jingoo Han
2014-02-10  1:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] Input: max8997_haptic: remove HAVE_PWM dependencies Jingoo Han
2014-02-10  1:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] Input: pwm-beepe: " Jingoo Han
2014-02-11 12:08   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-02-11 12:18     ` Jingoo Han
2014-02-11  3:02 ` Jingoo Han [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='007801cf26d5$aeaf3040$0c0d90c0$%han@samsung.com' \
    --to=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).