From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kristian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=F8nfeldt_S=F8rensen?= Subject: Re: PROBLEM: "BUG:" when resuming from suspend-to-ram Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:23:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1172766195.5543.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1172601905.5428.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1172622441.4587.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200702281345.15098.rjw@sisk.pl> <200703010036.28166.dtor@insightbb.com> <1172760952.21416.110.camel@miraculinux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux kernel mailing list List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:01 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On 3/1/07, Kristian Gr=F8nfeldt S=F8rensen wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 00:36 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > > > Please try the patch below. > > > > Hmmm. Is the diff against 2.6.20? All hunks except one fails when i try > > it. If I pass "-F 3" to patch, then one more hunk succeeds. Am I doing > > something wrong? > > >=20 > Hm, technically speaking it is against 2.6.21-rc2 but I think exceppt > for tsdev part it should apply to 2.6.20... >=20 OK. Something went wrong when copy pasting the patch to a file. Saved the entire mail, and applied it succesfully to 2.6.21-r2. Still only a couple of successfull hunks against 2.6.20. I'm compiling 2.6.21-rc2 right now, and then I'll try to see if the problem persists. /Kristian