From: Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>
To: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@aehallh.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
linux-input <linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:16:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193418991.7673.5.camel@moonpix.desrt.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071026164441.GI26573@aehallh.com>
On Fri, 2007-26-10 at 12:44 -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> A 'filter' cares about a key or two, and might even want to remove it
> from the stream, rfkill is a good example.
The patch introduces two different features that work nicely together
but, by no means have to be used together.
1) set interested events
By default, -all- events are delivered to an event device. you only
get selective delivery when you explicitly use the 'set bits' call.
2) filter
Filter all events that have been delivered to the user from further
propagation.
Notice that if you do not use feature #1 then you get all keystrokes
delivered to you (unless someone with a higher priority than you did
some filtering). If you then use feature #2 then you filter everything
(since everything is delivered to you).
I really do think that this is good for your use case. Your use of it
would basically involve opening the event device and saying
"ioctl(turn_filter_on);". The default case is that all keys are
delivered (and therefore blocked from anyone below you).
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-09 8:48 [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:12 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:23 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:40 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-07-02 15:20 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2007-07-03 16:45 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-07-03 22:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] ` <1191035147.7025.28.camel@moonpix.desrt.ca>
2007-10-23 13:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-23 15:57 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-23 18:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-24 1:58 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-24 3:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-24 15:35 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-10-25 5:37 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-26 16:44 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-10-26 17:16 ` Ryan Lortie [this message]
2007-10-26 17:58 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-10-26 17:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1193418991.7673.5.camel@moonpix.desrt.ca \
--to=desrt@desrt.ca \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
--cc=warp@aehallh.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).