From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Henrik Rydberg Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/002] linux-input: bcm5974-0.31: fixed resource leak, removed work struct, device data struct introduced Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 09:46:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1214984799.11086.6.camel@alnilam> References: <1214653629.10495.11.camel@alnilam> <20080701155925.a4c00a8e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]:39109 "EHLO ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754329AbYGBHsV (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jul 2008 03:48:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080701155925.a4c00a8e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, robfitz@273k.net, jikos@jikos.cz, vojtech@suse.cz, dmonakhov@openvz.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 15:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Subject: [PATCH 001/002] linux-input: bcm5974-0.31: fixed resource leak, removed work struct, device data struct introduced > > hm, I wonder where [002/002] went. Thank you very much for your comments, I will return shortly with a new version. I did not fully grasp, from reading Documentation/SubmitPatches, how the numbering in the subject should work; when I submit my new version in reply to your mail, should I submit a complete patch against the vanilla kernel, with number 001/003? Best Regards, Henrik Rydberg