From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andy Walls <awalls@radix.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v2] linux infrared remote control drivers
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:07:09 -0500
Message-ID: <1257379629.3074.13.camel@palomino.walls.org>
References: <200910200956.33391.jarod@redhat.com>
	 <C5A8E7EC-81D6-49AA-A65F-9F5D3DED1690@wilsonet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <C5A8E7EC-81D6-49AA-A65F-9F5D3DED1690@wilsonet.com>
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@wilsonet.com>
Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net>, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@bartelmus.de>
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:56 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> 
> > This here is a second go at submitting linux infrared remote control
> > (lirc) drivers for kernel inclusion, with a much smaller patch set  
> > that
> > includes only the core lirc driver and two device drivers, all three  
> > of
> > which have been heavily updated since the last submission, based on
> > feedback received.
> 
> Hm. Submitting this while the vast majority of people who might review  
> it were at the Japan Linux Symposium seems like it might have been a  
> bad idea. Or does no feedback mean its all good and ready to be  
> merged? ;)

Silence is concurrence. :)

Actually I will note, that lirc_dev.h uses kfifo:

http://git.wilsonet.com/linux-2.6-lirc.git/?a=blob_plain;f=drivers/input/lirc/lirc_dev.h;hb=f47f5e852d08f174c303d0ed53649733190014f7

but it least it appear to be nicely wrappered in that file. Moving to a
new kfifo implementation should be fairly easy, if the kfifo change
makes it in first.

Regards,
Andy