From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel
 IR 	system?
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:42:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1259419368.18747.0.camel@maxim-laptop>
References: <9e4733910911270757j648e39ecl7487b7e6c43db828@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B104971.4020800@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
	 <1259370501.11155.14.camel@maxim-laptop>
	 <m37hta28w9.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751799AbZK1Omu@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <m37hta28w9.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>, Christoph Bartelmus <christoph@bartelmus.de>, jarod@wilsonet.com, awalls@radix.net, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 12:20 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: 
> Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > If we add in-kernel decoding, we still will end up with two different
> > decoding, one in kernel and one in lirc.
> 
> And that's good. Especially for a popular and simple protocol such as
> RC5.
> Actually, it's not about adding the decoder. It's about fixing it.
> I can fix it.

This is nonsense.