From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Walls Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 06:38:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1259667480.3100.10.camel@palomino.walls.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Bartelmus Cc: jonsmirl@gmail.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, jarod@wilsonet.com, khc@pm.waw.pl, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, lirc-list@lists.sourceforge.net, mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 08:45 +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote: > Hi Jon, > > on 30 Nov 09 at 16:35, Jon Smirl wrote: > Currently I would tend to an approach like this: > - raw interface to userspace using LIRC > - fixed set of in-kernel decoders that can handle bundled remotes > > That would allow zero configuration for simple use cases and full > flexibility for more advanced use cases. > > Christoph I'd also prefer that approach. That probably comes as no surprise, but I may not be able to keep following/kibitzing in this thread. Christoph's statement sums up my preference. Regards, Andy