From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chase Douglas Subject: Re: [NEEDS TEST][PATCH] elantech: discard the first 2 positions reports for some firmwares Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 16:29:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1275251379.6666.76.camel@mini> References: <4C02B18D.3050003@tudelft.nl> <1275243114.6666.50.camel@mini> <20100530182600.GA32416@core.coreip.homeip.net> <1275245732.6666.70.camel@mini> <20100530201221.GA6069@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:40001 "EHLO adelie.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754730Ab0E3U3p (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2010 16:29:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100530201221.GA6069@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Piel , Florian Ragwitz , "linux-input@vger.kernel.org" On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 13:12 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > The patch was not taken from the commit, Eric just referenced the commit > as he gathered some additional information. The code in that commit is > so hideous that it would never get close to mainline as is. Ahhh, yes. Now I see what's going on. I thought, based on Eric's initial email and his related email describing the protocol, the commit was something we had in our tree that hadn't made it upstream. I should have read through everything a second time more thoroughly :). Thanks, -- Chase