From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 09/22] mfd: ab8500: Use power_supply_*() API for accessing function attrs Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 11:36:37 +0100 Message-ID: <1426156597.6371.5.camel@AMDC1943> References: <1426146260-30081-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <1426146260-30081-10-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20150312090156.GB3314@x1> <1426152267.31959.1.camel@AMDC1943> <20150312095017.GE3314@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:14131 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753407AbbCLKgl (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:36:41 -0400 In-reply-to: <20150312095017.GE3314@x1> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Jiri Kosina , Henrik Rydberg , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On czw, 2015-03-12 at 09:50 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On czw, 2015-03-12 at 09:01 +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > > Replace direct calls to power supply function attributes with wrappers. > > > > Wrappers provide safe access in case of unregistering the power > > > > supply (e.g. by removing the driver). Replace: > > > > - get_property -> power_supply_get_property > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > Acked-by: Jonghwa Lee > > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones > > > > Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel > > > > --- > > > > drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c | 7 ++++--- > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > Has the infrastructure for these been merged yet? > > > > > > I.e. Can I just take them? > > > > Previous patches were not merged yet so you cannot take it. This whole > > patchset can be applied incrementally but cherry picking won't work. > > So I only usually receive patches I've already Acked when a) the bulk > of the set has been merged and I can apply the remaining lingerers, or > b) the whole set is due to be applied through the MFD tree. > > Receiving 2 patches of a 22 patch set, which I have already Acked and > that I can't pick is unwelcome noise. Sorry for the noise, it should not happen. That is strange, how did you receive this patch? I resent this only to certain recipients because previous mail got lost in spam filters (too many recipients). I did not put other maintainers (like you) this time on cc-list. git-send-email also did not cc-ed you (your email is not listed in send-email log). How this email managed to get to you? :) Best regards, Krzysztof