From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com, jikos@kernel.org,
benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 04:11:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455221494-2915-1-git-send-email-even.xu@intel.com> (raw)
Current ISH driver only registers suspend/resume PM callbacks which don't
support hibernation (suspend to disk). Basically after hiberation, the ISH
can't resume properly and user may not see sensor events
(for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following message
in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from ISHTP device
So this patch adds support for S4/hiberbation to ISH by using the
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly. The suspend
and resume functions will now be used for both suspend to RAM and hibernation.
If power management is disabled, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing, the suspend
and resume related functions won't be used, so mark them as __maybe_unused to
clarify that this is the intended behavior, and remove #ifdefs for power
management.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c | 22 +++++++---------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
index 582e449..a2c53ea 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c
@@ -205,8 +205,7 @@ static void ish_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
kfree(ishtp_dev);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM
-static struct device *ish_resume_device;
+static struct device __maybe_unused *ish_resume_device;
/* 50ms to get resume response */
#define WAIT_FOR_RESUME_ACK_MS 50
@@ -220,7 +219,7 @@ static struct device *ish_resume_device;
* in that case a simple resume message is enough, others we need
* a reset sequence.
*/
-static void ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+static void __maybe_unused ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ish_resume_device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -262,7 +261,7 @@ static void ish_resume_handler(struct work_struct *work)
*
* Return: 0 to the pm core
*/
-static int ish_suspend(struct device *device)
+static int __maybe_unused ish_suspend(struct device *device)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -288,7 +287,7 @@ static int ish_suspend(struct device *device)
return 0;
}
-static DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
+static __maybe_unused DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
/**
* ish_resume() - ISH resume callback
* @device: device pointer
@@ -297,7 +296,7 @@ static DECLARE_WORK(resume_work, ish_resume_handler);
*
* Return: 0 to the pm core
*/
-static int ish_resume(struct device *device)
+static int __maybe_unused ish_resume(struct device *device)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(device);
struct ishtp_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -311,21 +310,14 @@ static int ish_resume(struct device *device)
return 0;
}
-static const struct dev_pm_ops ish_pm_ops = {
- .suspend = ish_suspend,
- .resume = ish_resume,
-};
-#define ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS (&ish_pm_ops)
-#else
-#define ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
+static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ish_pm_ops, ish_suspend, ish_resume);
static struct pci_driver ish_driver = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.id_table = ish_pci_tbl,
.probe = ish_probe,
.remove = ish_remove,
- .driver.pm = ISHTP_ISH_PM_OPS,
+ .driver.pm = &ish_pm_ops,
};
module_pci_driver(ish_driver);
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 20:11 Even Xu [this message]
2018-06-13 11:34 ` [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation Jiri Kosina
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-11 1:56 Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-12 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-06-12 15:30 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:05 ` Xu, Even
2018-06-13 0:14 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13 0:04 ` Xu, Even
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1455221494-2915-1-git-send-email-even.xu@intel.com \
--to=even.xu@intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).