Re: [RFC PATCH] input: Add disable sysfs entry for every input device

[Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>]

On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 18:09 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 02 January 2017 16:27:05 Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 11:04 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > This patch allows user to disable events from any input device so
> > > events
> > > would not be delivered to userspace.
> > > 
> > > Currently there is no way to disable particular input device by
> > > kernel.
> > > User for different reasons would need it for integrated PS/2
> > > keyboard or
> > > touchpad in notebook or touchscreen on mobile device to prevent
> > > sending
> > > events. E.g. mobile phone in pocket or broken integrated PS/2
> > > keyboard.
> > > 
> > > This is just a RFC patch, not tested yet. Original post about
> > > motivation
> > > about this patch is there: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/29/92
> > 
> > Having implemented something of that ilk in user-space (we
> > automatically disable touch devices when the associated screen is
> > turned off/suspended), I think this might need more thought.
> 
> How to implement such thing in userspace? I think you cannot do that 
> without rewriting every one userspace application which uses input.
> 
> > What happens when a device is opened and the device disabled
> through
> > sysfs, are the users revoked?
> 
> Applications will not receive events. Same as if input device does
> not 
> generates events.
> 
> > Does this put the device in suspend in the same way that closing
> the
> > device's last user does?
> 
> Current code not (this is just RFC prototype), but it should be
> possible 
> to implement.
> 
> > Is this not better implemented in user-space at the session level,
> > where it knows about which output corresponds to which input
> device?
> 
> How to do that without rewriting existing applications?
> 
> > Is this useful enough to disable misbehaving devices on hardware,
> so
> > that the device is not effective on boot?  
> 
> In case integrated device is absolutely unusable and generates
> always 
> random events, it does not solve problem at boot time.
> 
> But more real case is laptop with closed LID press buttons and here
> it 
> is useful.

There's usually a display manager in between the application and the
input device. Whether it's X.org, or a Wayland compositor. Even David's
 https://github.com/dvdhrm/kmscon could help for console applications.