From: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>,
russianneuromancer@ya.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v2] Input: goodix - Poll the 'buffer status' bit before reading data
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:57:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507899456.5910.21.camel@hadess.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171013111907.6913-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 13:19 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> From: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
>
> The Goodix panel triggers an interrupt on touch events. However, its
> registers will contain the valid values a short time after the
> interrupt, and not when it's raised. At that moment, the 'buffer
> status'
> bit is set.
>
> Previously, if the 'buffer status' bit was not set when the registers
> were read, the data was discarded and no input event was emitted,
> causing "finger down" or "finger up" events to be missed sometimes.
>
> This went unnoticed until v4.9, as the DesignWare I2C driver commonly
> used with this driver had enough latency for that bug to never
> trigger.
Link to the bug fix?
> Now, in the IRQ handler we will poll (with a timeout) the 'buffer
> status'
> bit and process the data of the panel as soon as this bit gets set.
>
> Note that the Goodix panel will send a few spurious interrupts after
> the
> 'finger up' event, in which the 'buffer status' bit will never be
> set.
>
> Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
> Cc: russianneuromancer@ya.ru
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> [hdegoede@redhat.com: Change poll loop to use jiffies,
> add comment about typical poll time]
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c | 36
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> index 32d2762448aa..a2071c132a2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/goodix.c
> @@ -195,18 +195,38 @@ static int goodix_get_cfg_len(u16 id)
>
> static int goodix_ts_read_input_report(struct goodix_ts_data *ts, u8
> *data)
> {
> + unsigned long timeout;
> int touch_num;
> int error;
>
> - error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client, GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR,
> data,
> - GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE + 1);
> - if (error) {
> - dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "I2C transfer error:
> %d\n", error);
> - return error;
> - }
> + /*
> + * The 'buffer status' bit, which indicates that the data is
> valid, is
> + * not set as soon as the interrupt is raised, but slightly
> after.
> + * This takes around 10 ms to happen, so we poll for 20 ms.
> + */
> + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(20);
around 16msec is the time between 2 frames on a 60Hz display. Is 20msec
what we want? Does this looping block below any other parts of the
kernel, or does it run in its own thread?
> + do {
> + error = goodix_i2c_read(ts->client,
> GOODIX_READ_COOR_ADDR,
> + data, GOODIX_CONTACT_SIZE +
> 1);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "I2C transfer
> error: %d\n",
> + error);
> + return error;
> + }
>
> - if (!(data[0] & 0x80))
> - return -EAGAIN;
> + if (data[0] & 0x80)
> + break;
> +
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000); /* Poll every 1 - 2 ms */
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + if (!(data[0] & 0x80)) {
> + /*
> + * The Goodix panel will send spurious interrupts
> after a
> + * 'finger up' event, which will always cause a
> timeout.
> + */
> + return 0;
> + }
>
> touch_num = data[0] & 0x0f;
> if (touch_num > ts->max_touch_num)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-13 11:19 [PATCH resend v2 0/1] input: goodix: Poll the 'buffer status' bit before reading Hans de Goede
2017-10-13 11:19 ` [PATCH resend v2] Input: goodix - Poll the 'buffer status' bit before reading data Hans de Goede
2017-10-13 12:57 ` Bastien Nocera [this message]
2017-10-13 13:49 ` Hans de Goede
2017-10-13 14:03 ` Bastien Nocera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507899456.5910.21.camel@hadess.net \
--to=hadess@hadess.net \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).