From: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
To: Andrew de los Reyes <andrew-vger@gizmolabs.org>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@logitech.com>,
Andrew de los Reyes <adlr@chromium.org>,
Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>,
Linux Input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: disable io in probe error path
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1881826.nJFi2vHdMH@al> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_cf+fx8Xk4t7fsGkb6bkFEPCXQg6rcAOk7arUD34B8QRShgQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 11 December 2014 09:37:06 Andrew de los Reyes wrote:
> On Thu Dec 11 2014 at 7:31:43 AM Benjamin Tissoires
> <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 11 2014 or thereabouts, Peter Wu wrote:
> > > Balance a hid_device_io_start() call with hid_device_io_stop() in the
> > > error path. This avoids processing of HID reports when the probe fails
> > > which possibly leads to invalid memory access in hid_device_probe() as
> > > report_enum->report_id_hash might already be freed via
> > > hid_close_report().
> >
> > Well spotted too!
> >
> > >
> > > hid_set_drvdata() is called before wtp_allocate, be consistent and clear
> > > drvdata too on the error path of wtp_allocate.
> >
> > This is not strictly speaking required. We will have a dangling value in
> > hdev->private_data, but this should be overwritten before the next use.
> >
> > Anyway, it makes sense to clean up after a failure, so the patch is
> > Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Benjamin
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > There are few users of hid_device_io_start/stop, this is the first one
> > > to get start/stop out of sync. Should the comment of
> > > hid_device_io_start() be updated to ensure that hid_device_io_stop()
> > > gets called before probe() returns? Or should the hid-core be changed to
> > > handle this out-of-sync issue:
>
> I do not have a strong opinion on this, and will defer to others. The
> reason I needed to communicate during probe() was to have the driver
> probe the actual device for details. In this use case, I would be okay
> to disable IO at the end of probe() and have it become reenabled via
> the normal (default) methods.
>
> -andrew
Keeping the reports enabled when the probe succeeds is fine, I am
referring to the error path. If the probe fails, then reports should
never be accepted or a corruption may occur (if I see it correctly).
Is this analysis correct?
hid_device_probe()
hid_device_io_start()
return FAILURE
hid_close_report(device)
report_enum = device
->report_enum[i]
hid_free_report(report_enum
->report_id_hash[j]) <-- NOTE: freed
... interrupt occurs ...
hid_input_report()
hid_get_report()
report = report_enum->report_id_hash[n];
^ NOTE: use-after-free
return report if not NULL
hdrv->raw_event(report) <--- BOOM?
kfree(device->rdesc)
device->driver = NULL
Kind regards,
Peter
> > >
> > > if (ret) {
> > > if (hdev->io_started))
> > > down(&hdev->driver_input_lock);
> > > hid_close_report(hdev);
> > > hdev->driver = NULL;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Is my observation correct or not that HID reports can arrive during
> > > hid_close_report() when io_started == true?
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Peter
> > > ---
> > > drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 4 +++-
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > index 4292cc3..2f420c0 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > > @@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@ static int hidpp_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> > > if (hidpp->quirks & HIDPP_QUIRK_CLASS_WTP) {
> > > ret = wtp_allocate(hdev, id);
> > > if (ret)
> > > - return ret;
> > > + goto wtp_allocate_fail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > INIT_WORK(&hidpp->work, delayed_work_cb);
> > > @@ -1141,6 +1141,7 @@ static int hidpp_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> > > if (id->group != HID_GROUP_LOGITECH_DJ_DEVICE) {
> > > if (!connected) {
> > > hid_err(hdev, "Device not connected");
> > > + hid_device_io_stop(hdev);
> > > goto hid_parse_fail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1186,6 +1187,7 @@ hid_hw_start_fail:
> > > hid_parse_fail:
> > > cancel_work_sync(&hidpp->work);
> > > mutex_destroy(&hidpp->send_mutex);
> > > +wtp_allocate_fail:
> > > hid_set_drvdata(hdev, NULL);
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.1.3
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-11 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-11 12:51 [PATCH 0/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: fixes for error conditions Peter Wu
2014-12-11 12:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: do not return the name length Peter Wu
2014-12-11 15:22 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11 12:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: check name retrieval return code Peter Wu
2014-12-11 15:23 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11 12:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: add boundary check for name retrieval Peter Wu
2014-12-11 15:25 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11 12:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: disable io in probe error path Peter Wu
2014-12-11 15:31 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2014-12-11 17:37 ` Andrew de los Reyes
2014-12-11 17:53 ` Peter Wu [this message]
2014-12-11 22:11 ` Andrew de los Reyes
2014-12-11 22:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] HID: logitech-hidpp: fixes for error conditions Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1881826.nJFi2vHdMH@al \
--to=peter@lekensteyn.nl \
--cc=adlr@chromium.org \
--cc=andrew-vger@gizmolabs.org \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nlopezcasad@logitech.com \
--cc=peter.hutterer@who-t.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).