From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@insightbb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make ati_remote button repeat sensitivity soft-configurable
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 22:51:06 -0400
Message-ID: <200704032251.06396.dtor@insightbb.com>
References: <f9be06770704031734k11ec894fpdf1afe385108aece@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
In-Reply-To: <f9be06770704031734k11ec894fpdf1afe385108aece@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz?body=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-input-request@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz?body=unsubscribe>
To: Karl Pickett <karl.pickett@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org

Hi Karl,

On Tuesday 03 April 2007 20:34, Karl Pickett wrote:
> The ati_remote driver is a little too sensitive for my wife... if you
> do anything but barely tap the button you can get multiple events
> reported. =A0We prefer a more conservative no-repeat setting. =A0This is a
> pretty trivial patch which just makes one hard coded value soft
> configurable and does not change the default.
>=20

Makes sense. Can I please have a Signed-off-by: ... line from you so
I can apply the patch to my tree?

Thanks!

=2D-=20
Dmitry