From: "Zephaniah E. Hull" <warp@aehallh.com>
To: Ryan Lortie <desrt@desrt.ca>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>,
linux-input <linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab.
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:44:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071026164441.GI26573@aehallh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193290654.15893.2.camel@moonpix.desrt.ca>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:37:34AM -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-24-10 at 11:35 -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > We need a way to, at the absolute minimum, unbind the keyboard from the
> > text console. The current solution sucks for things like rfkill.
> >
> > I'm not convinced that Ryan's fix is any better, but just saying that X
> > should open the console and ignore the characters is simply not an
> > option as far as I am concerned for X.
>
> Can you think of any other way to separate things like rfkill/evdev from
> things like the text console that's less hacky than my 'priority'
> scheme?
What we really want to give is exclusitivity verses other 'end users',
as opposed the 'filters'.
I'm defining an 'end user' to be a handler that cares about all the
events from a device and plans on doing something with it.
That would be the console layer for keyboards, /dev/input/mice and
/dev/input/mouse<n> for mice, X for both of those, etc.
A 'filter' cares about a key or two, and might even want to remove it
from the stream, rfkill is a good example.
Now, how do we design for that? Not a clue right now, still thinking
about it really.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-26 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-09 8:48 [PATCH] Input: Support for a less exclusive grab Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:07 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:12 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:19 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:23 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-06-12 5:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-06-12 5:40 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-07-02 15:20 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2007-07-03 16:45 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-07-03 22:15 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] ` <1191035147.7025.28.camel@moonpix.desrt.ca>
2007-10-23 13:21 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-23 15:57 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-23 18:10 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-24 1:58 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-24 3:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-10-24 15:35 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-10-25 5:37 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-26 16:44 ` Zephaniah E. Hull [this message]
2007-10-26 17:16 ` Ryan Lortie
2007-10-26 17:58 ` Zephaniah E. Hull
2007-10-26 17:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071026164441.GI26573@aehallh.com \
--to=warp@aehallh.com \
--cc=desrt@desrt.ca \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).