From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:39:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> References: <32209efe0711122242m3a5f081asf1c11a38b24db10c@mail.gmail.com> <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:53 -0800 > > NETWORKING=========================================================== > > > > RTNLGRP_ND_USEROPT does not report ifindex (IPv6) > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349 > > Kernel: 2.6.24+ > > No response from developers That's funny, then how come there was a proper patch fix posted and it's now in my tree ready to go to Linus? I think you like just saying "No response from developers" over and over again to make some of point about how developers are ignoring lots of bugs. That's fine, but at least be accurate about it :-)