From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:49:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20071113034916.2556edd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <32209efe0711122242m3a5f081asf1c11a38b24db10c@mail.gmail.com> <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: owner-linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Unsubscribe: To: David Miller Cc: protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:39:46 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: > From: Andrew Morton > Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:15:53 -0800 > > > > NETWORKING=========================================================== > > > > > > RTNLGRP_ND_USEROPT does not report ifindex (IPv6) > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9349 > > > Kernel: 2.6.24+ > > > > No response from developers > > That's funny, then how come there was a proper patch fix posted > and it's now in my tree ready to go to Linus? > > I think you like just saying "No response from developers" over and > over again to make some of point about how developers are ignoring > lots of bugs. That's fine, but at least be accurate about it :-) Do you believe that our response to bug reports is adequate?