From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oliver Neukum Subject: Re: [rft]power management for usbtouch Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:53:17 +0200 Message-ID: <200806281453.17896.oliver@neukum.org> References: <200806261557.19095.oliver@neukum.org> <200806281252.39386.oliver@neukum.org> <20080628112258.GK19430@sci.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080628112258.GK19430-ORSVBvAovxo@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-usb-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ville =?iso-8859-1?q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Cc: daniel.ritz-OI3hZJvNYWs@public.gmane.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Jiri Kosina , linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Alan Stern List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Am Samstag 28 Juni 2008 13:22:58 schrieb Ville Syrj=E4l=E4: > Typically when you're testing something you expect a certain result. = The > code as it stands adds another very subtle failure point. >=20 > I don't quite understand why you're so against handling this issue. In hindsight adding that interface at all was an error. I was in favor of it and that was a mistake. Maybe it should be removed. Complicating good drivers for its sake I therefore consider an error. Possibly we should consider a forcible suspension a form of disconnecti= on. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html