From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Phil Endecott <phil_dubhl_endecott@chezphil.org>
Cc: linux-input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Slow boot due perhaps to locks in mouse and platform system
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:54:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081014104442.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223993968942@dmwebmail.dmwebmail.chezphil.org>
Hi Phil,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 03:19:28PM +0100, Phil Endecott wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am seeing a 2-second pause while booting which I hypothesize is due to a
> locking interaction between the mouse system and the platform bus system.
> Here's a fragment from dmesg:
>
> [ 2.202156] serio: i8042 KBD port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
> [ 2.202170] serio: i8042 AUX port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
> [ 2.202183] initcall i8042_init+0x0/0x32a returned 0 after 29 msecs
> [ 2.202191] calling serio_raw_init+0x0/0x11 @ 1
> [ 2.202345] initcall serio_raw_init+0x0/0x11 returned 0 after 0 msecs
> [ 2.202356] calling mousedev_init+0x0/0x72 @ 1
> [ 2.202638] mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
> [ 2.202648] initcall mousedev_init+0x0/0x72 returned 0 after 0 msecs
> [ 2.202657] calling evdev_init+0x0/0xa @ 1
> [ 2.208739] initcall evdev_init+0x0/0xa returned 0 after 5 msecs
> [ 2.208746] calling atkbd_init+0x0/0x1b @ 1
> [ 2.208855] initcall atkbd_init+0x0/0x1b returned 0 after 0 msecs
> [ 2.208864] calling psmouse_init+0x0/0x58 @ 1
> [ 2.232546] input: AT Translated Set 2 keyboard as /class/input/input5
> [ 2.247037] initcall psmouse_init+0x0/0x58 returned 0 after 36 msecs
> [ 2.247047] calling pcspkr_init+0x0/0xa @ 1
> [ 2.247067] pcspkr_probe starting
> [ 2.249202] input: PC Speaker as /class/input/input6
> [ 2.259239] pcspkr_probe done
> [ 4.379527] input: ImPS/2 Logitech Wheel Mouse as /class/input/input7
> [ 4.387077] initcall pcspkr_init+0x0/0xa returned 0 after 2040 msecs
>
> Note that the pause is between pcspkr_probe returning and pcspkr_init
> returning. My guess is that during this time the platform bus is matching
> the pcspkr driver against all the other platform devices, and in order to
> do so it is taking various device locks; at the same time the kpsmoused
> workqueue is locking one of the same devices and spending a couple of
> seconds probing it. But that's only a guess based on a couple of hours
> work; no doubt you experts will have a better idea of what's going on.
>
Hmm, I am not sure here. Psmouse module works on serio bus (with
devices registered by i8042). The real probing is offloaded to kseriod
as it may take a while (as in couple of seconds) to go through all
possible mice protocols - you can see it because psmouse_init returns
early, before the mouse is detected. Pcspkr works on platform bus. The
only thing they share is input device registration but I don't believe
we get stuck there. I wonder if this is a sign of scheduling problem
early in the boot, lets CC Ingo and see if he has any ideas.
> What can be done about this? Is it unreasonable for the mouse probing to
> take 2 seconds? Should it not be holding the conflicting lock while it is
> probing? Does the platform matching code really need to hold the lock when
> it's just comparing the string names of the device and driver?
>
> This is on an ASUS Eee 901, which is the same machine that Arjan van de Ven
> and Auke Kok have got to boot in 5 seconds (with only 1 second of that in
> the kernel). As you can see I have some way to go still. I would also be
> interested to hear if anyone knows what the touchpad in this machine really
> is - is "ImPS/2 Logitech Wheel Mouse" right? I'd like to be able to tweak
> things like tap-to-click and two-finger scrolling.
>
I believe Eee PCs use Elantech touchpad for which we have a driver from
Arjan Opmeer which should be merged real soon now.
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-14 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 14:19 Slow boot due perhaps to locks in mouse and platform system Phil Endecott
2008-10-14 14:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2008-10-14 15:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-14 15:29 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-14 15:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-14 23:17 ` Phil Endecott
2008-10-15 2:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-15 9:19 ` Phil Endecott
2008-10-22 23:07 ` Phil Endecott
2008-10-14 15:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-14 15:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2008-10-14 15:58 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-10-14 16:18 ` Phil Endecott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081014104442.ZZRA012@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=phil_dubhl_endecott@chezphil.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).