From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:16:26 -0800 Message-ID: <200902280416.26687.david-b@pacbell.net> References: <1235762883-20870-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com> <200902272046.50572.david-b@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from n21.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.160]:47554 "HELO n21.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751236AbZB1MQb (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:16:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Andrew Morton , me@felipebalbi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sameo@openedhand.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl On Saturday 28 February 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, David Brownell wrote: > > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c > > > > Where you'll observe twl_init_irq() at line 688 setting > > up the thread and the Primary IRQ Handler (PIH) dispatch. > > That's pretty much bog-standard chained IRQ setup code, > > except that it chains through a thread. > > So this would be the perfect candidate to test the generic threaded > code I posted a few days ago ? Could be. URL?