From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs (was: ...) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:29:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20090302132953.27126b78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1235762883-20870-1-git-send-email-me@felipebalbi.com> <200903011454.22280.david-b@pacbell.net> <1235999772.5330.368.camel@laptop> <200903021304.56881.david-b@pacbell.net> <1236028617.18955.14.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51148 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753293AbZCBVax (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:30:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1236028617.18955.14.camel@twins> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: david-b@pacbell.net, tglx@linutronix.de, me@felipebalbi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, sameo@openedhand.com On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:16:57 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > we should simply always disable interrupts for > > > interrupt handlers. > > > > That would be why you have refused to fix the bug > > in lockdep, whereby it forcibly enables that flag? > > > > I've been wondering for some months now why you've > > left that bug unfixed. > > Because running irq handlers with irqs enabled it plain silly. Do we get to revert irqstacks?