From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: suspend / hibernate nomenclature Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 23:19:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20090308231935.GA32624@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1235992429.3858.58.camel@hughsie-work.lan> <15e53e180903080045x5874f05cv5ea836d73e3855b1@mail.gmail.com> <20090308144145.GB26233@srcf.ucam.org> <200903082156.46219.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090308230741.GA5357@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56032 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383AbZCHXTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:19:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090308230741.GA5357@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Richard Hughes , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , linux-acpi , Peter Hutterer , linux-input , Matthias Clasen On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 04:07:50PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > - KEY_SLEEP - leave the keycode, the action should be the default > system state defined by either platform or user. I expect that the vast > majority of system have default state similar to S3 so there should not > be anysurprises. > > - KEY_SUSPEND - provide better comment for its intended usage and maybe > add KEY_HIBERNATE alias. > > - KEY_SUSPEND2RAM - add a new definition. > > Do you think this would this work? I think that would be fine, though I'm not entirely convinced that we need KEY_SUSPEND2RAM as a separate keycode. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org