linux-input.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about usage of RCU in the input layer
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:53:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090321225318.5b25f0a7@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090322051822.GG7148@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:18:22 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> > I'm measuring the time that the following code takes:
> > 
> >         init_completion(&rcu.completion);
> >         /* Will wake me after RCU finished. */
> >         call_rcu(&rcu.head, wakeme_after_rcu);
> >         /* Wait for it. */
> >         wait_for_completion(&rcu.completion);
> > 

> 
> No, my confusion -- I misread as 2700 milliseconds rather than 2700
> -microseconds-.  2700 microseconds (or 2.7 milliseconds) is in the
> expected range for synchronize_rcu() on an HZ=1000 system.  2.7
> seconds would of course be way out of line.

> > > If the former, exactly which kernel are you using?  The single-CPU
> > > optimization was added in 2.6.29-rc7, commit ID a682604838.
> > 
> > a bit after -rc8, specifically  commit
> > 5bee17f18b595937e6beafeee5197868a3f74a06
> 
> How many synchronize_rcu() calls are you seeing on the boot path?

I see 20 that hit the above code path (eg ones that wait) until
userspace starts.


> Also, are you running with NO_HZ=y?

of course...  is there any other way ? ;-)

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-22  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19  4:58 Question about usage of RCU in the input layer Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-19  7:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-03-19 14:02   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-19  8:56 ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-03-19 14:18   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20  2:07     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20  3:20       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20  4:45         ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20  5:28           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20  6:01             ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-03-20  6:35               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-20 13:50           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20 14:31             ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20 18:13               ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21  1:27                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21  4:58                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21 18:58                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 19:51                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-21 20:26                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21 21:07                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  3:40                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  4:38                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  4:51                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22  5:18                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22  5:53                                 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2009-03-22 16:53                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 19:46                                     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22 20:52                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 22:44                                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-22 23:03                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-22 23:16                                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-23  1:27                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-03  1:27                                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21 21:13                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-03-20 22:21               ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-21  5:46         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-03-21  9:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-21 18:58             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090321225318.5b25f0a7@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).