From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Winbond driver as PNP Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:01:21 -0600 Message-ID: <200907101001.22122.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> References: <1246079912-17619-1-git-send-email-david@hardeman.nu> <200907091538.21685.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <11512ed726f2d6754f46e76c7db191a8.squirrel@www.hardeman.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <11512ed726f2d6754f46e76c7db191a8.squirrel@www.hardeman.nu> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David =?iso-8859-1?q?H=E4rdeman?= Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, Len Brown List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Friday 10 July 2009 01:55:27 am David H=E4rdeman wrote: > On Thu, July 9, 2009 23:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Here are two sample patches to show you what I was suggesting. The= se > > apply on top of the two Winbond patches currently in -mm. >=20 > Thanks, great service :) >=20 > I'll test the patches as soon as I have time and access to the hardwa= re. >=20 > One question though, the resulting patch series (if AKPM merges these > patches in addition to the existing ones and drops the patch adding > .shutdown to acpi_driver) will be git bisect unfriendly. >=20 > Should I roll two new patches instead to replace the three patches > currently in -mm? If you like the approach and it works, I would take the latter approach (replace the three patches with two new ones -- e.g., add-pnp-shutdown-method and add-winbond-pnp-driver). I don't think we have to worry about bisectability until they show up in a git tree. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html