From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: Threaded interrupts for synaptic touchscreen in HTC dream Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:56:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20090722145654.GA4987@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20090721160436.GD4352@dtor-d630.eng.vmware.com> <20090721222547.GA1948@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20090722121800.GD21171@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <1248269443.27058.1449.camel@twins> <20090722143211.GB29404@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dmitry Torokhov , Trilok Soni , Pavel Machek , Arve Hj?nnev?g , kernel list , Brian Swetland , linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andrew Morton , linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Joonyoung Shim , m.szyprowski-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, t.fujak-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, kyungmin.park-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, David Brownell , Daniel Ribeiro List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 04:52:21PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Mark Brown wrote: > > The chips I'm deling with can certainly support doing that but I'm not > > sure there'd be enormous advantages - a lot of the interrupt handlers > > will either be trivial (eg, RTC ticks or alarms) or be serialised by a > > need to interact with the chip anyway. I'd expect this to be generally > > true, though ICBW. > So in your case it would be possible to run the various subdevice > thread_fn handlers from your main interrupt thread one after each > other ? That's what they're all doing at present outside of genirq.