From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] input: Add KEY_RFKILL_ALL Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 22:51:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20090801215130.GA24201@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1249152859-14769-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <1249159133.3491.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090801204534.GA23642@srcf.ucam.org> <1249159942.3491.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090801205445.GA23751@srcf.ucam.org> <1249163327.3491.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1249163327.3491.24.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dmitry.torokhov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:48:47PM -0700, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > why is it confusing? I don't understanding your argument here. I think > the KEY_RFKILL_ALL is confusing is the user policy then only kills WiFi > devices or toggles between various on/off combinations. Having it be KEY_RFKILL implies that KEY_WLAN and similar aren't related to rfkill. KEY_RFKILL_ALL implies that the key invokes policy on all rfkill devices, which is the aim here. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html