From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] TOUCHSCREEN: S3C24XX touchscreen driver from Arnaud Patard. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:12:47 +0000 Message-ID: <20091119171247.GB22232@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20091118232939.201290297@fluff.org.uk> <20091118232948.063635416@fluff.org.uk> <20091119025930.GA20172@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4B052D50.2070002@simtec.co.uk> <20091119135236.GB5535@digital-scurf.org> <20091119170321.GB15647@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091119170321.GB15647@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Daniel Silverstone , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Simtec Linux Team , Arnaud Patard List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:03:21AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Why everyone thinks that it is a good idea to pile workarounds for > software issues in the kernel but updating the other parts of software > stack is a big no-no? It's probably because pressing 'reset' and have your board TFTP the new kernel straight from your development machine is far easier than going through the hoops to regenerate a root filesystem and reflashing it. Note that I'm not condoning it, just pointing out why it happens. And yes, we must resist the temptation to merge such workarounds.