From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Torokhov Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:50:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20091126235057.GG6936@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <1259024037.3871.36.camel@palomino.walls.org> <6D934408-B713-49B6-A197-46CE663455AC@wilsonet.com> <4B0E889C.9060405@redhat.com> <4B0EBBB5.5090303@wilsonet.com> <4B0EBF99.1070404@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B0EBF99.1070404@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jarod Wilson , Andy Walls , Christoph Bartelmus , khc@pm.waw.pl, j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, superm1@ubuntu.com List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:49:13PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Dmitry, > > While lirc is basically a series of input drivers, considering that they have lots > in common with the input drivers at V4L/DVB and that we'll need to work on > some glue to merge both, do you mind if I add the lirc drivers at drivers/staging from > my trees? > Mauro, I would not mind if you will be pushing it to staging, however I am not sure we have an agreement on what exactly the interface that we will be using. I would hate to get something in that will need to be reworked again. Thanks. -- Dmitry