From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Problems with remote-wakeup settings Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 23:04:49 +0100 Message-ID: <201003052304.49261.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201003052208.09486.oliver@neukum.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201003052208.09486.oliver@neukum.org> Sender: linux-hotplug-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Neukum Cc: Alan Stern , Linux-pm mailing list , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org, USB list , Kernel development list List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org On Friday 05 March 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. M=E4rz 2010 21:59:31 schrieben Sie: > > > I guess it's better if drivers don't set should_wakeup if unsure,= but of course > > > that's impossible to enforce. > >=20 > > That's the real question. Ideally, drivers won't touch should_wake= up. =20 > > How do we get there from here? >=20 > Enable it only for devices specifically designed for wakeup, that is > keyboards, power buttons and WoL, perhaps also mice and modems. > Are we far away from that? I don't think we're very far from that. Mice are known dangerous, especially the USB ones, though. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html