* Two questions regarding evdev
@ 2010-03-24 20:53 David Härdeman
2010-03-24 21:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Härdeman @ 2010-03-24 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-input; +Cc: dmitry.torokhov
I've been going over the evdev (drivers/input/evdev.c) code since I'm
using it as inspiration for a small project I'm hacking on. So far I
have two questions with regard to the code:
First, evdev_event passes a new event to all connected clients (writing
it to each client's event fifo) and then calls wake_up_interruptible.
However, given that all clients will have at least one new event to read
after evdev_event is done, shouldn't wake_up_interruptible_all be called
instead?
Second, evdev_poll never sets the POLLOUT flag, but evdev can accept
writes (which will be passed to input_inject_event), so shouldn't the
POLLOUT flag always be set?
Regards,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Two questions regarding evdev
2010-03-24 20:53 Two questions regarding evdev David Härdeman
@ 2010-03-24 21:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Torokhov @ 2010-03-24 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Härdeman; +Cc: linux-input
Hi David,
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 01:53:32 pm David Härdeman wrote:
> I've been going over the evdev (drivers/input/evdev.c) code since I'm
> using it as inspiration for a small project I'm hacking on. So far I
> have two questions with regard to the code:
>
> First, evdev_event passes a new event to all connected clients (writing
> it to each client's event fifo) and then calls wake_up_interruptible.
> However, given that all clients will have at least one new event to read
> after evdev_event is done, shouldn't wake_up_interruptible_all be called
> instead?
wake_up() vs. wake_up_all() only matters if there is exclusive waiters
which evdev does not use. PLease see comment/explanation for wake up
here:
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.33/kernel/sched.c#L5685
>
> Second, evdev_poll never sets the POLLOUT flag, but evdev can accept
> writes (which will be passed to input_inject_event), so shouldn't the
> POLLOUT flag always be set?
We could but I guess nobody tries to pull evdev for writing, everyone
is interested in reading.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-24 21:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-24 20:53 Two questions regarding evdev David Härdeman
2010-03-24 21:41 ` Dmitry Torokhov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).