From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] liss331d1: accelerometer driver Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 23:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20100414233723.25da5af0@linux.intel.com> References: <20100414124913.23181.75903.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20100414125155.23181.56610.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <4BC63DC5.8040501@tudelft.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4BC63DC5.8040501-hGVxb2UgFK3z+pZb47iToQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWM=?= Piel Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, linux-input-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org > I wouldn't want to be too picky, if this driver works fine with your > hardware and it's tested, why not, but from looking at the spec of > this chip (and at the code of this driver), it looks like it could be > completely compatible with the lis3lv02d driver (with lis3lv02d_i2c). > Same registers, including the WHO_AM_I register which returns 0x3B > (which is a supported version). I will take a look in detail. The IRQ bit is different and as you say the retries can be added to it anyway. > > Have you tried and there were some specific incompatibilities? I am picking this project up rather than being directly responsible for its history - chances are nobody has. Alan